Article View: comp.os.os2.misc
Article #17490Re: OS/2
From: Duane Bozarth
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 00:00
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 00:00
103 lines
5275 bytes
5275 bytes
rr wrote: > Andrew Holmes wrote: > > > > I've been using win95 for the last 18months and have just gone over to > > OSR2. Is there any benefit of going to OS/2, and will my current Win'95 > > software like office'97 still work? > > > > -- > > Andy Holmes. > > > > mailto:andyholmes@mistral.co.uk > > http://www3.mistral.co.uk/andyholmes/win95 > > I have been using OS/2 for quite awhile and can tell you that a > changeover from Windows 95 would be a tremendous upgrade for you. Aside As far as the OS, yes, I agree...otherwise, see later on... > from stability OS/2 offers the ability to customized your system to > exactly meet your needs. Windows 95, to me, is more of hack. If all > you plan to do is run games then stick with Windows. As to the Win95 > Apps they wont run in an out of the Box OS/2 WarpIV configuration but > some of them could run using either the base WIN32s implementation of > OS/2 or using XFreeOS2 and running a Win95 Emulator such as Wine. > (XFreeOS2 will let you run some of the XWin software used on Linux > systems and its FREE). I would not recommend do either because I > beleave that OS/2 has a very good application base to begin with. > > 1. The bonus pack which comes with OS/2 is loaded with great software > from productivity tools to a great PIM program. Great???? Come on, now!!!! Works is a joke for anything except small text documents and the capabilities compared to Excel of the spreadsheet are miniscule....e.g, try putting a graphic image in a Works document.... > Furthermore there are > several software developers that either have software or are developing > software which would meet your needs. And if you like application > Suites then I can tell you that the StarOffice Suite will give Office > Pak 97 a Run for their money check them out they have versions for > almost every platform. > They are slowly getting there, but are way behind.....not knocking them, where was IBM providing developer support back when 2.0/2.1 was being introduced? > 2. Java support is built in and was the first Operating system to have > the JVM intergrated into the desktop. > This is good..... > 3. As for connectivity the networking capabilities of OS/2 are far > superior than that of Win95 > So is this.... > [snip] > On the down side OS/2 requires a small amount of learning on how a > computer really works and how networks really work if you plan to set up > a small lan/wan. But its not as bad as it seems first the information is > readily available with you installation and there is a wealth of Web > Sites that show you just how to set up any feature you may require in > OS/2. Other than that I see no real obstacles. > On the real downside, drivers are difficult to get for many devices (see complaints about HP Deskjet printers for one simple example) and compatability with MS shops is a problem for many.... > PS. - On my system I run just about everything, > (netscape,Pmmail,Newsreader, Goserve WebServer, Netbios File & Printer > Sharing, Process Commander, Unzip & Install, Crack RC5 64 bit, and > voiceType dictation for IRC Sessions Great !!!) any slowdowns NO !!!! It > All Runs Smoothly and I can Even Format a Floppy at the same time :D ha, > ha ... (Inside Joke - Can't figure out why OS2'rs always bring this one > up, yes it demonstrates the multitasking and multithreading > capabilities/power of OS/2 but what does this mean to anyone when almost > all the floppies you buy nowadays are already formatted !!!) But do you do any WORK on that machine?????....this is all play as near as I can tell. What substitutes (equivalently) for AutoCad, Matlab, TecPlot, layout design tools, graphics apps for scientific presentation/visualization, ....??? Mathematica or Maple are alternatives in some ways, but extremely expensive compared to capable alternatives in Windows world... If you are aware of such, let me know.... > For more information take a look at Timur's Web Page > http://www.os2ss.com/Information/NewUsers/ Good place...Timur is super!!! Duane Bozarth bozarthd.at.smtpg.dot.compsys.dot.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<345401E0.7E0A3C4F@smtpg.compsys.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<344CFD22.5D17F764@mistralk.co.uk> <34538101.5BF1@home.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f4337,1bc29dceb6f1e76c X-Google-Attributes: gidf4337,public X-Google-Thread: fabaa,1bc29dceb6f1e76c X-Google-Attributes: gidfabaa,public X-Google-Thread: 11b872,1bc29dceb6f1e76c X-Google-Attributes: gid11b872,public X-Google-Thread: 10fb18,1bc29dceb6f1e76c X-Google-Attributes: gid10fb18,public X-Google-Thread: 104dc3,1bc29dceb6f1e76c X-Google-Attributes: gid104dc3,public X-Google-Thread: 1044c2,1bc29dceb6f1e76c X-Google-Attributes: gid1044c2,public X-Google-Thread: 10f27c,1bc29dceb6f1e76c X-Google-Attributes: gid10f27c,public From: Duane Bozarth <bozarthd@smtpg.compsys.com> Subject: Re: OS/2 Date: 1997/10/26 Message-ID: <345401E0.7E0A3C4F@smtpg.compsys.com> X-Deja-AN: 285231507 References: <344CFD22.5D17F764@mistralk.co.uk> <34538101.5BF1@home.org> Organization: Computational Systems, Inc. Reply-To: bozarthd@smtpg.compsys.com Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.setup.misc,comp.os.os2.utilities,de.comp.os.os2.setup,demon.ip.support.os2,relcom.comp.os.os2,prima.support.os2