🚀 go-pugleaf

Michael Baldwin, Bruce writes:

>>>> Doesn't change the fact that you asked about an irrelevant subject,
>>>> Bruce.  Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?

>>> "Clasic" evasion,

>> I'm well aware that your failure to answer the question constitutes
>> evasion, Bruce.  No need to tell me about it.

> "Clasic" illogic on your part,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>>> Are you a complete idiot or not?

>> What does your question to a nonexistent "Dickless" have to do with
>> colored text in DeScribe, Bruce?

> The subject asks if you are a complete idiot or not,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, given that I am not
"Dickless", Bruce.  Still suffering from reading comprehension
problems?

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> I see nothing about coloured text in DeScribe.

You also don't see anything about "Dickless" in the attribution,
Bruce.

> If you had better reading
> "comprehenion" skills you would know that by now.

How ironic, coming from someone with poor reading comprehension
skills.

>>>> I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, Bruce.  No need to
>>>> tell me.

>>> Note: no response.

>> Classic illogic, given that by writing "Note: no response", you've
>> responded, Bruce.

> Non sequitur,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>>>>>> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>>>> Note:  no response.

>> Note:  still no response.

> "Clasic" illogic,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> Dickless,

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> given that by writing "Note: still no
> response", you've responded.

Illogical, given that it is you who hadn't responded, Bruce.  Still
suffering from reading comprehension problems?

>>>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

>>> Who is "Malloy",

>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

> You certainly are,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> Why are you now calling me "Malloy"?

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

>>>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

>>> Who is "Malloy",

>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

> You certainly are,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> Why are you now calling me "Malloy"?

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

>>> And why are you calling me "Malloy"?

>> What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with colored
>> text in DeScribe, Bruce?

> "Clasic" evasion,

I'm well aware that your failure to answer the question constitutes
evasion, Bruce.  No need to tell me about it.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>>>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

>>> Who is "Malloy",

>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

> You certainly are,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> Why are you now calling me "Malloy"?

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

>>> And why are you calling me "Malloy"?

>> What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with colored
>> text in DeScribe, Bruce?

> "Clasic" evasion,

I'm well aware that your failure to answer the question constitutes
evasion, Bruce.  No need to tell me about it.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> And why were you calling me "Malloy"?

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

> Another one of your "lassic" fuckups?

What does your ridiculous question have to do with colored text in
DeScribe, Bruce?

>>>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

>>> Who is "Malloy",

>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

> You certainly are,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> Why did you call me "Malloy"?

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

> Are you in your usual confused mental state again?

What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with colored
text in DeScribe, Bruce?

> Or were you merely hallucinating again?

What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with colored
text in DeScribe, Bruce?

>>> And why are you calling me "Malloy"?

>> What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with colored
>> text in DeScribe, Bruce?

> "lassic" evasion,

I'm well aware that your failure to answer the question constitutes
evasion, Bruce.  No need to tell me about it.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> Why did you call me "Malloy"?

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

>>>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

>>> Who is "Malloy",

>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

> You certainly are,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> Why had you called me "Malloy"?

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

>>> And why are you calling me "Malloy"?

>> What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with colored
>> text in DeScribe, Bruce?

> Non sequitur,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> Dickless,

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> and rather ironic given that you are the one evading my questions.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

>> Note:  no response.

> I'm well aware that you didn't answer my questions, which constitutes
> evasion,

Classic projection.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> No need to tell me about it.

Classic projection.

>>> Who is "Malloy",

>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

> You certainly are,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>>> And why are you calling me "Malloy"?

>> What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with colored
>> text in DeScribe, Bruce?

> Non sequitur,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> Dickless,

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> and rather ironic given that you called me "Malloy".

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

>>>>>> The subject line says "Malloy digest", Bruce.  Still suffering from
>>>>>> reading comprehension problems?

>>>>> It says "Is Dickless a complete idiot?",

>>>> Classic dishonesty on your part, Bruce.

>>> You mean on your part,

>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> On your part,

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> The subject is still "Is Dickless a complete idiot?".

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

>>> <snip> Ooops! That's all there was!

>> Non sequitur.

> That you would make yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim is
> indeed non sequitur,

Classic erroneous presupposition.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?