🚀 go-pugleaf

April fool Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham the irrelevant Ignoranus
whined and tholed:
> Michael Baldwin, Bruce writes:
>
> >>> Bruce AKA the alleged jmalloy wrote:
>
> >>>> Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:
>
> >>>>> Dickless Davie tholoon@antispam.ham the irrelevant Ignoranus whined and
> >>>>> tholed:
>
> >>>>>> The ones you removed from your follow-up, Bruce.  Classic evasion.
>
> >>>>> "Clasic" lie, Dickless. No lines or words were removed by me in my
> >>>>> follow-up. You would know that by now, had you better reading
> >>>>> "comprehenion" skills, Dickless.
>
> >>>> This oar pin has a "lassic" inferiority complex, Bruce, he's posted at
> >>>> least 22 "responses" to cooa in the last 16 hours and he's probably not
> >>>> done yet. Yikes!  He's got it bad...
>
> >>> I know, Bruce.
>
> >> Why are you addressing Joe Malloy as "Bruce", Bruce?  Still suffering
> >> from attribution problems?
>
> > Your cluelessness and stupidity noted,
>
> Classic projection.  I see that you didn't answer the question, Bruce.
> No surprise there, really.

"Clasic" projection and evasion, Dickless.

> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> > Who is "Bruce",
>
> Still suffering from schizophrenia, Bruce?

On your part, Dickless.

> > Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

Who is "Bruce", Dickless?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> > Still suffering from reading "comprehenion" problems?
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.

On your part, Dickless.

> >>> No need to remind me of Dickless' "clasic" inferiority
> >>> complex.
>
> >> There is no "Dickless" involved in the discussion, Bruce.
>
> > Your cluelessness and stupidity noted once again,
>
> Classic projection.  I see that you didn't answer the question, Bruce.
> No surprise there, really.

"Clasic" stupidity on your part, Dickless. No surprise there, really.

> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> > Who is "Bruce",
>
> Still suffering from schizophrenia, Bruce?

"Clasic" repetition of "lassic" stupidity, Dickless. No surprise there,
really.

> > Dickless?
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> > Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.

On your part, Dickless.

> >>> He's insanely jealous of us because, like his siblings, we're
> >>> all better than him.
>
> >> There is no "Dickless" involved in the discussion, Bruce.
>
> > "Clasic" hallucination,
>
> Is that your explanation for your use of a name for a person not
> involved in the discussion, Bruce?

Who would that be, Dickless? Still hallucinating? No surprise there,
really.

> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> >>>> Still, it doesn't match his record which is about 125 postings in 24
> >>>> hours.  Gosh, you'd think an astrologer would have more to do than he does.
>
> >>> He obviously doesn't work out his ephemerides with a pencil, Bruce,
> >>> like every good astrologer should.
>
> >> There is no "Dickless" involved in the discussion, Bruce.
>
> > "Clasic" stupidity,
>
> Is that your explanation for your use of a name for a person not
> involved in the discussion, Bruce?

Who would that be, Dickless? Still hallucinating? No surprise there,
really.

> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> >>>> Hey, Dickless, here's a simple task: Get your favorite word processor to
> >>>> print a sentence in which each letter is in a different color.  Ha!
>
> >>> He'd sooner do it in FORTRAN, Bruce - once he gets his FORTRAN code
> >>> fixed.
>
> >> There is no "Dickless" involved in the discussion, Bruce.
>
> > "Clasic" hallucination,
>
> Is that your explanation for your use of a name for a person not
> involved in the discussion, Bruce?

Who would that be, Dickless? Still hallucinating? No surprise there,
really.

> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> > If you had better reading
> > "comprehenion" and logic skills, Dickless,
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> > you would realise by now
> > that you are responding to us when we call you Dickless,
>
> Who are "us" and "we", Bruce?  Still suffering from schizophrenia?

Lack of a clue on your part noted, Dickless.

> > Dickless.
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
> > Therefore, this implies tacit admission that you acknowledge your
> > nickname.
>
> Classic illogic, coupled with an unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, Dickless.

Now, what does your ongoing antagonism have to do with coloured text in
DeScribe, Dickless?