🚀 go-pugleaf

Michael Baldwin, Bruce writes:

>>>>>>>> Joseph Malloy writes:

>>>>>>>>> This oar pin has a "lassic" inferiority complex, Bruce, he's posted at
>>>>>>>>> least 22 "responses" to cooa in the last 16 hours and he's probably not
>>>>>>>>> done yet. Yikes!  He's got it bad...

>>>>>>>> How ironic, coming from someone who is not done yet.

>>>>>>> Are they your famous last words,

>>>>>> What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Bruce?

>>>>> Non sequitur and another ironic "lassic" evasion,

>>>> I'm well aware that your failure to answer the question constitutes
>>>> evasion, Bruce.  No need to tell me about it.

>>> Another "Clasic" evasion on your part,

>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Note:  no response.

>>> Dickless.

>> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

Note:  no response.

>>> No surprise there, really.

>> That you would make yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim is
>> indeed no surprise, Bruce.

Note:  no response.

>>>>> Dickless.

>>>> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>> Note:  no response.

Note:  still no response.

>>>>>>> Dickless?

>>>>>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

>>>>> "Clasic" stupidity,

>>>> Is that your explanation for your attribution problem, Bruce?

>>> On your part,

>> Non sequitur.

Note:  no response.

>>> Dickless.

>> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

Note:  no response.

>>> If you weren't so stupid, you would know that by now.

>> Classic erroneous presupposition.

Note:  no response.

>>>>> Dickless.

>>>> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>> Note:  no response.

Note:  still no response.

>>>>>>>>> Still, it doesn't match his record which is about 125 postings in 24
>>>>>>>>> hours.  Gosh, you'd think an astrologer would have more to do than he does.

>>>>>>>> How ironic, coming from someone who has more to do than be an
>>>>>>>> antagonist on USENET.

>>>>>>> Yes, Bruce AKA the alleged Joe Malloy has done more on Usenet,

>>>>>> What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Bruce?

>>>>> What does that have to do with classical music,

>>>> I see that you didn't answer the question, Bruce.  No surprise there,
>>>> really.

>>> Note: no response.

>> I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, Bruce.  No need to
>> tell me.

Note:  no response.

>>>>> Dickless?

>>>> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>> Note:  no response.

Note:  still no response.

>>>>>>> Dickless.

>>>>>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

>>>>> What does that have to do with coloured text in DeScribe,

>>>> The subject line says "Malloy digest", Bruce.

>>> Not any more,

>> Doesn't change the fact that you asked about an irrelevant subject,
>> Bruce.  Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?

> "Clasic" evasion,

I'm well aware that your failure to answer the question constitutes
evasion, Bruce.  No need to tell me about it.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> Are you a complete idiot or not?

What does your question to a nonexistent "Dickless" have to do with
colored text in DeScribe, Bruce?

>>> Dickless.

>> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

Note: no response.

>>>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?

>>> Note: no response.

>> I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, Bruce.  No need to
>> tell me.

> Note: no response.

Classic illogic, given that by writing "Note: no response", you've
responded, Bruce.

>>>>> Dickless?

>>>> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>> Note:  no response.

Note:  still no response.

>>>>>>> You would know that by now, had you better reading
>>>>>>> "comprehenion" skills.

>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.

>>>>> On your part,

>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

>>> On your part,

>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Note:  no response.

>>> Dickless.

>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

> Who is "Malloy",

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

> Dickless?

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>>>>> Dickless.

>>>> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>> Note:  no response.

Note:  still no response.

>>>>>>>>> Hey, Dickless, here's a simple task: Get your favorite word processor to
>>>>>>>>> print a sentence in which each letter is in a different color.  Ha!

>>>>>>>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

>>>>>>> "Clasic" evasion,

>>>>>> I'm well aware that your failure to answer the questions constitutes
>>>>>> evasion, Bruce.  No need to tell me about it.

>>>>> What questions,

>>>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

>>> Its evident you are,

>> Non sequitur.

Note:  no response.

>>> Dickless.

>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

> Who is "Malloy",

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

> Dickless?

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> And why are you calling me "Malloy"?

What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with colored
text in DeScribe, Bruce?

>>>>> Dickless?

>>>> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>> Note:  no response.

Note:  still no response.

>>>>> I am the one asking you the questions around here.

>>>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

>>> Its evident you are,

>> Non sequitur.

Note:  no response.

>>> Dickless.

>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

> Who is "Malloy",

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

> Dickless?

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> And why are you calling me "Malloy"?

What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with colored
text in DeScribe, Bruce?

>>>>> You are the one evading them.

>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

>>> On your part,

>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Note:  no response.

>>> Dickless.

>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

> Who is "Malloy",

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

> Dickless?

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> And why are you calling me "Malloy"?

What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with colored
text in DeScribe, Bruce?

>>>>> No need to remind me of your evasion.

>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.

>>> On your part,

>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Note:  no response.

>>> Dickless.

>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

> Who is "Malloy",

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

> Dickless?

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> And why are you calling me "Malloy"?

What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with colored
text in DeScribe, Bruce?

>>>>>>> Dickless.

>>>>>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

>>>>>>> To be expected of someone who evades all questions put to him.

>>>>>> Thus expected of you, Bruce.

>>>>> Non sequitur, Dickless, and rather ironic given that you are the one
>>>>> evading me questions.

>>>> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>>> "Clasic" evasion,

>> I'm well aware that you didn't answer my questions, which constitutes
>> evasion, Bruce.  No need to tell me about it.

Note:  no response.

>>> Dickless.

>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

> Who is "Malloy",

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

> Dickless?

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> And why are you calling me "Malloy"?

What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with colored
text in DeScribe, Bruce?

>>>>>>> No surprise there, really.

>>>>>> Your ongoing evasion is indeed no surprise, Bruce.

>>>>> On your part,

>>>> Non sequitur.

>>> "Clasic" illogic.

>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Note:  no response.

>>>>> Dickless.

>>>> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>> Note:  no response.

Note:  still no response.

>>>>> Now, what does that have to do with coloured text in DeScribe,

>>>> The subject line says "Malloy digest", Bruce.  Still suffering from
>>>> reading comprehension problems?

>>> It says "Is Dickless a complete idiot?",

>> Classic dishonesty on your part, Bruce.

> You mean on your part,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> <snip> Ooops! That's all there was!

Non sequitur.