🚀 go-pugleaf

Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham the irrelevant Ignoranus whined and
tholed:
> Michael Baldwin, Bruce writes:
>
> > Bruce AKA the alleged jmalloy wrote:
>
> >> Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:
>
> >>> Dickless Davie tholoon@antispam.ham the irrelevant Ignoranus whined and
> >>> tholed:
>
> >>>> The ones you removed from your follow-up, Bruce.  Classic evasion.
>
> >>> "Clasic" lie, Dickless. No lines or words were removed by me in my
> >>> follow-up. You would know that by now, had you better reading
> >>> "comprehenion" skills, Dickless.
>
> >> This oar pin has a "lassic" inferiority complex, Bruce, he's posted at
> >> least 22 "responses" to cooa in the last 16 hours and he's probably not
> >> done yet. Yikes!  He's got it bad...
>
> > I know, Bruce.
>
> Why are you addressing Joe Malloy as "Bruce", Bruce?  Still suffering
> from attribution problems?

Your cluelessness and stupidity noted, Dickless. Who is "Bruce",
Dickless? Still suffering from reading "comprehenion" problems?

> > No need to remind me of Dickless' "clasic" inferiority
> > complex.
>
> There is no "Dickless" involved in the discussion, Bruce.

Your cluelessness and stupidity noted once again, Dickless. Who is
"Bruce", Dickless? Still suffering from attribution problems?

> > He's insanely jealous of us because, like his siblings, we're
> > all better than him.
>
> There is no "Dickless" involved in the discussion, Bruce.

"Clasic" hallucination, Dickless.

> >> Still, it doesn't match his record which is about 125 postings in 24
> >> hours.  Gosh, you'd think an astrologer would have more to do than he does.
>
> > He obviously doesn't work out his ephemerides with a pencil, Bruce,
> > like every good astrologer should.
>
> There is no "Dickless" involved in the discussion, Bruce.

"Clasic" stupidity, Dickless.

> >> Hey, Dickless, here's a simple task: Get your favorite word processor to
> >> print a sentence in which each letter is in a different color.  Ha!
>
> > He'd sooner do it in FORTRAN, Bruce - once he gets his FORTRAN code
> > fixed.
>
> There is no "Dickless" involved in the discussion, Bruce.

"Clasic" hallucination, Dickless. If you had better reading
"comprehenion" and logic skills, Dickless, you would realise by now
that you are responding to us when we call you Dickless, Dickless.
Therefore, this implies tacit admission that you acknowledge your
nickname.