🚀 go-pugleaf

Michael Baldwin, Bruce writes:

>>>> Joseph Malloy writes:

>>>>> This oar pin has a "lassic" inferiority complex, Bruce, he's posted at
>>>>> least 22 "responses" to cooa in the last 16 hours and he's probably not
>>>>> done yet. Yikes!  He's got it bad...

>>>> How ironic, coming from someone who is not done yet.

>>> Are they your famous last words,

>> What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Bruce?

> Non sequitur and another ironic "lassic" evasion,

I'm well aware that your failure to answer the question constitutes
evasion, Bruce.  No need to tell me about it.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>>> Dickless?

>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

> "Clasic" stupidity,

Is that your explanation for your attribution problem, Bruce?

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>>>>> Still, it doesn't match his record which is about 125 postings in 24
>>>>> hours.  Gosh, you'd think an astrologer would have more to do than he does.

>>>> How ironic, coming from someone who has more to do than be an
>>>> antagonist on USENET.

>>> Yes, Bruce AKA the alleged Joe Malloy has done more on Usenet,

>> What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Bruce?

> What does that have to do with classical music,

I see that you didn't answer the question, Bruce.  No surprise there,
really.

> Dickless?

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>>> Dickless.

>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

> What does that have to do with coloured text in DeScribe,

The subject line says "Malloy digest", Bruce.  Still suffering from
reading comprehension problems?

> Dickless?

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>>> You would know that by now, had you better reading
>>> "comprehenion" skills.

>> Classic erroneous presupposition.

> On your part,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>>>>> Hey, Dickless, here's a simple task: Get your favorite word processor to
>>>>> print a sentence in which each letter is in a different color.  Ha!

>>>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

>>> "Clasic" evasion,

>> I'm well aware that your failure to answer the questions constitutes
>> evasion, Bruce.  No need to tell me about it.

> What questions,

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

> Dickless?

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> I am the one asking you the questions around here.

Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Bruce?

> You are the one evading them.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> No need to remind me of your evasion.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

>>> Dickless.

>> Who is "Dickless", Malloy?  Also suffering from attribution problems?

>>> To be expected of someone who evades all questions put to him.

>> Thus expected of you, Bruce.

> Non sequitur, Dickless, and rather ironic given that you are the one
> evading me questions.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

>>> No surprise there, really.

>> Your ongoing evasion is indeed no surprise, Bruce.

> On your part,

Non sequitur.

> Dickless.

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?

> Now, what does that have to do with coloured text in DeScribe,

The subject line says "Malloy digest", Bruce.  Still suffering from
reading comprehension problems?

> Dickless?

Who is "Dickless", Bruce?  Still suffering from attribution problems?