Thread View: comp.os.os2.misc
4 messages
4 total messages
Started by b.vaneps
Tue, 15 Dec 1998 00:00
Fix for SIQ in Warp4?
Author: b.vaneps
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 00:00
21 lines
1464 bytes
1464 bytes
G'Day!
I have recently upgraded from Warp3 FP32 to Warp4 FP5
and have noticed that this version still defaults to the
original Single Input Queue model. I believe that while
installing FP32, I noticed a new feature to use multiple
queues instead, however I cannot find the information on
how to do this for Warp4.
If anyone knows if it is possible to eliminate the SIQ
problem for Warp4, I would greatly appreciate it if you
could please direct me to where I can find this
information. An e-mail reply would be appreciated. Thanks
very much for any help!
--
Brad van Eps: b.vaneps@nabalco.com.au
OS/2 WARPed for REAL power!
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Re: Fix for SIQ in Warp4?
Author: Michael Holzapfel
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 00:00
25 lines
1375 bytes
1375 bytes
b.vaneps@nabalco.com.au writes: > G'Day! > I have recently upgraded from Warp3 FP32 to Warp4 FP5 > and have noticed that this version still defaults to the > original Single Input Queue model. I believe that while > installing FP32, I noticed a new feature to use multiple > queues instead, however I cannot find the information on > how to do this for Warp4. It was FP 17 for Warp3.... > > If anyone knows if it is possible to eliminate the SIQ > problem for Warp4, I would greatly appreciate it if you > could please direct me to where I can find this > information. An e-mail reply would be appreciated. Thanks > very much for any help! System-Objekt has an Option like "Async Focus Change". It is activated by default. -- Michael Holzapfel <michael@ime.rwth-aachen.de>
Re: Fix for SIQ in Warp4?
Author: Bob Eager
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 00:00
15 lines
1195 bytes
1195 bytes
On Thu, 17 Dec 1998 00:50:03, "Clive" <cliveATcee3DOTdemonDOTcoDOTuk> wrote: > (feeling pendantic...;-) ) Swinging backwards and forwards round someone's neck. are we? Or do you mean PEDANTIC? (being pedantic, too) -- Bob Eager rde at tavi.co.uk PC Server 325; PS/2s 8595*3, 9595, 9595A (P60!), 8535, 8570, 9556, 8580*5, 8557, 9556, 8550, 9577, 8530, P70, PC/AT..
Re: Fix for SIQ in Warp4?
Author: Michael Block
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 00:00
46 lines
2062 bytes
2062 bytes
On Thu, 17 Dec 1998 21:13:38, "Clive" <cliveATcee3DOTdemonDOTcoDOTuk> wrote: &&&>On 17 Dec 1998 17:17:48 GMT, Bob Eager wrote: &&&> &&&>:>On Thu, 17 Dec 1998 00:50:03, "Clive" <cliveATcee3DOTdemonDOTcoDOTuk> &&&>:>wrote: &&&>:> &&&>:>> (feeling pendantic...;-) ) &&&>:> &&&>:>Swinging backwards and forwards round someone's neck. are we? &&&>:> &&&>:>Or do you mean PEDANTIC? (being pedantic, too) &&&>:> &&&> &&&> &&&>LOL!!! &&&> &&&>oops.. must have been a slip of the fingre.... &&&> &&&>,c. &&&> &&&> &&&> unfortunately we are still stuck with the stupis SIQ, OS/2s biggest headache IMHO. Regards Michael Block ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I AM BILL GATES OF BORG STANDARDISATION IS IRRELEVANT USABILITY IS IRRELEVANT CHOICE IS IRRELEVANT PREPARE TO BE ASSIMILATED WE ARE MICROSOFT ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ resistance is not useless, join the Warp alternative, think for yourself! http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/2265/ read about the Microsoft Shared Delusional Disorder.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads