Article View: comp.os.os2.networking
Article #255Re: Including OS/2 in a small work-group
From: Richard Warner
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 15:20
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 15:20
61 lines
3699 bytes
3699 bytes
orville%weyrich@tnet.com (Orville R. Weyrich) writes: >For about $300/node I can set up TCP/IP and NFS to share files between >OS/2 and MS-DOS/Windows platforms :-( >If I leave OS/2 out of the picture, I can use Novell NetWare Lite to get >the same functionality as TCP/IP and NFS in a small local area net, for >only about $70/node. :-) >But then I am stuck with a FAT file system. :-( >What I really want is Novell NetWare Lite for OS/2 or else a much cheaper >source for TCP/IP and NFS for DOS/Windows [I want DOS nodes to be able to >"publish" network volumes as well as "mount" them.] TCP stacks can be had for cheap (nothing - using CUTCP or NCSA). NFS is expensive, generally, because it is costly to implement. Development costs are high, plus NFS vendors pay Sun a license fee .... >I don't consider Novell Regular 2.xx or 3.xx to be reasonable cost -- >what I want is a simple inexpensive peer-to-peer network that 8086 >and 80286 processor nodes can participate in. >Or have the vendors involved (Novell, IBM, etc.) conspired to suppress >the functionality that I want in order to enhance sales of more expensive >solutions [that may be worth it if I needed their full functionality, >which I don't]? :-( It seems as if everyone is quick to postulate 'conspiracy' when the price of a product does not fit their expectations. Again, you can get TCP stacks for little/nothing (CUTCP/NCSA). IBM has to cover the costs of development, distribution, and support for their product. NFS products have these same costs, with the added burden of license payments to Sun. There is only one 'free' NFS implementation - SOSS. But this is the server side of NFS, not the client side that you want. The NFS client market is owned by Sun; the only other major player in this field at the moment is Beame & Whiteside (Novell's client side NFS is a licensed version of B&W's). Peer-to-peer networks are a niche market. IBM had one - the IBM LAN program - which was a dog. It required a lot of memory, and then ran at tortoise speeds. Novell ate it for lunch and ArtiSoft (LANtastic) picked up the crumbs. Now with OS/2 and other OS's on the horizon there may be new markets for peer-to-peer, but it will take a while for offerings to show up and then market acceptance will determine how long they stay. There is another option you have ignored, but it is not that cheap and it definitely leaves out you 8088/6 boxes. That is DesqView/X. DVX can run over IPX, so you could have a Netware-lite LAN and then run DVX on the clients. Not 'publishing' the way you want, but it does permit peer-to-peer access. Cost of DVX is $180 at our local store. >orville >-------------------------------------- ********************************** >Orville R. Weyrich, Jr. Weyrich Computer Consulting >Certified Data Processor POB 5782, Scottsdale, AZ 85261 >Certified Systems Professional Voice: (602) 391-0821 >Certified Computer Programmer Internet: orville%weyrich@tnet.com >-------------------------------------- **********************************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul27.152021.9219@sjsumcs.sjsu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!wupost!gumby!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcomsv!sjsumcs!rickReferences:
<1992Jul26.070826.6464@weyrich.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!wupost!gumby!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcomsv!sjsumcs!rick From: rick@sjsumcs.sjsu.edu (Richard Warner) Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking Subject: Re: Including OS/2 in a small work-group Message-ID: <1992Jul27.152021.9219@sjsumcs.sjsu.edu> Date: 27 Jul 92 15:20:21 GMT References: <1992Jul26.070826.6464@weyrich.UUCP> Organization: San Jose State University - Math/CS Dept. Lines: 61