Article View: comp.os.os2.networking
Article #292<None>
From: 01calvin
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 03:25
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 03:25
64 lines
3341 bytes
3341 bytes
Hi,
I'm not an OS/2 user, but I've been put in charge of putting
together an office at my university that has just bought 3
machines bundled with OS/2 on the hard drives.
They have also said that they will be wanting to incorporate
file and printer sharing. I suggested some form of Peer to Peer
network allowing them to access the same databases, etc, etc.
Now it starts to get tricky. One of the machines is to be used
by an administrator (not in the office) whos involvement in that
office's daily business is negligable. The odd print job to the
laser may occur but that is all. (As of now she is sticking with
sneakernet.) She has stated however that since the campus is going
fiber optic (that is just about every building is being connected
to the back bone) she would like to have access to that if for
nothing else than for E-mail.
One of the machines in the office will have the same requirements
as the above machine as well as file and printer sharing.
Now I figured that machine A and B would be connected to the
backbone and be able to utilize telnet and ftp and whatever.
This is good. Also I thought that machines B and C would be
connect as a peer to peer network and do their thing. This is
also good.
What I want to know is... Will machine B need two ethernet
cards? Will there be a problem connecting it in this way?
Upon further consideration, I thought that a hub off the backbone
connecting all the machines and perhaps a print server or
something to that effect may be better. I started looking at
prices and found that a 12 connector hub for 10base T ethernet
(twisted pair) runs around $2300 dollars. Even with university
funding, it's a little out of their range. This of course
would satisfy any expansion that may occur as well, providing
it can be implimented in this way.
Can anyone tell me if there is a better solution?
Better = less expensive, more effective.
Will the hub idea work? I'm sure some arrangement could be made
to overcome the cost of the hub. Renting or whatever.
Is there a problem with OS/2 and networking of any form?
Networking in this way? Each machine will have it's own copy
of OS/2. All they need to share are X number of files and one
printer so a client-server network is not really necessary.
Not that they could afford a dedicated server anyway, but you
get the idea.
You can E-mail me or post a reply. I'm sure that others may
find something of interest in it as well. Flames? Well, only
if I screwed up on netiquette.
PS. In case you were wondering, my summer job is hardware and
software support at the university computer lab.
Spiff
_l\l\l\ 01calvin@ac.dal.ca "We are free to go where we
Oc O ) Vanguard@ac.dal.ca wish and to be what we are."
\_/ / Goldrick@ug.cs.dal.ca - Jonathan Livingston Seagull
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul31.002502.6752@ac.dal.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!destroyer!ubc-cs!utcsri!torn!csd.unb.ca!morgan.ucs.mun.ca!nstn.ns.ca!ac.dal.ca!01calvinShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!destroyer!ubc-cs!utcsri!torn!csd.unb.ca!morgan.ucs.mun.ca!nstn.ns.ca!ac.dal.ca!01calvin From: 01calvin@ac.dal.ca Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking Subject: <None> Message-ID: <1992Jul31.002502.6752@ac.dal.ca> Date: 31 Jul 92 00:25:02 -0300 Organization: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Lines: 64