Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer.misc
Article #133Re: Requiem for OpenDoc
From: bgqhrdrrdw0.bnl Chris J. Alumbau...
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 00:00
54 lines
3902 bytes
3902 bytes
In message <E77v9M.GLK@watserv3.uwaterloo.ca> - carsten@edm2.com (Carsten Whimster - EDM/2)Tue, 18 Mar 1997 02:08:10 GMT writes: :> :> :>I know one company who will care about this announcement: the company :>that bought Mesa and Clearlook (Sundial?). They have supposedly been :>working on releasing their programs as OpenDoc components. This type :>of thing can sink a small company like that. Yeah, and that is what really irritates me about IBM. It is getting harder and harder to "still believe". IBM makes awesome technology, but doesn't know how to sell it. To large companies and to consumers,, stuff has to be "sold". They have to be given a reason "beyond" the fact that it is good technology to buy into it. Large companies have to be sold on a "bottom line" approach, and consumers simply have to be innundated with glitchy commercials, since the techno-aspect of it all is generally lost on them. However, in between the big companies and the unwashed masses, we have the companies and the people who are intelligent enough to recognize the value of the technology, without having to be "sold" on it, and who are flexible enough to choose things based on things other than the bottom line, if it so suits them. So for Sundial, and those of us as individuals who looked forward to the promise of opendoc technology, IBM's failures are starting to really add up. I don't know about the technical aspects of Javabeans and Opendoc "merging" or whatever, but I do know that IBM is stupid for leaving those that "voluntarily" supported their technology high and dry. The saddest part of all is,,, they could have made opendoc an accepted industry technology. Ever since they bought Lotus,, Lotus has been fighting IBM's initiatives tooth and nail every step of the way,, well, for my money, IBM's CEO should have grabbed Lotus's CEO by the short hairs, and explained the situation to him.. Lotus should have been Showcasing IBM technology, and it shouild have been top priority and done quickly. They didn't, they prefered to "follow Bill" around picking up MS _Office crumbs (when are these people gonna learn?) and what good did it do? MS-Office still owns the windows market, Smartsuite for OS/2 sucks (compared to what it shouild be/could have been), and IBM's technology is wasted cuz Lotus wanted to be a captive x shop. I don't know how well Sundial will be able to weather this kind of setback, but if/when they release an OS/2 "suite",, I will be in line to buy it, (even though I already have dbexpert) and I still hope it will be opendoc components, because I think Opendoc was a good idea. Of course, the idea behind opendoc is prettty useless if you are the only one using it. (G). Chris J. Alumbaugh ******************************** As it is SPOKEN.. so it appears OS/2 Warp 4.0 and Voice Dictation ******************************** * my email address in the header has been hacked* * please shift all letters 1 letter to the right* *to decipher correct address to reply by email*
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<332e80c6.0@news.essex1.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5ghtkv$lan@server1.erinet.com> <5gim25$2l@dopey.magg.net> <E77v9M.GLK@watserv3.uwaterloo.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ee4f,6baa961c420547b0 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ee4f,public X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,6baa961c420547b0 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public X-Google-Thread: 1138ec,6baa961c420547b0 X-Google-Attributes: gid1138ec,public X-Google-Thread: 11307a,6baa961c420547b0 X-Google-Attributes: gid11307a,public From: bgqhr!drrdw0.bnl (Chris J. Alumbaugh) Subject: Re: Requiem for OpenDoc Date: 1997/03/18 Message-ID: <332e80c6.0@news.essex1.com> X-Deja-AN: 226415350 Distribution: world References: <5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5ghtkv$lan@server1.erinet.com> <5gim25$2l@dopey.magg.net> <E77v9M.GLK@watserv3.uwaterloo.ca> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer.misc,bit.listserv.os2-l,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.org.team-os2