Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer.misc
Article #148Re: Requiem for OpenDoc
From: Glen
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 00:00
12 lines
1380 bytes
1380 bytes
Brooks Adair (badair@magg.net) wrote: : What's realy stupid is that Java and OpenDoc should not even be looked at as : compeating technoligies, they are complementary. IBM should be working to : integrate them. Within the same article from Infoworld, IBM and Sun are looking into seeing if they can use any part of OpenDoc to make Java Beans more robust. Nothing has been decided on but I view it as a positive move by IBM. --Glen
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5gjjal$1k5$1@ralph.vnet.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net><5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5ghtkv$lan@server1.erinet.com> <5gim25$2l@dopey.magg.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ee4f,6baa961c420547b0 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ee4f,public X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,6baa961c420547b0 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public X-Google-Thread: 11307a,6baa961c420547b0 X-Google-Attributes: gid11307a,public X-Google-Thread: 1138ec,6baa961c420547b0 X-Google-Attributes: gid1138ec,public From: glenco@vnet.net (Glen) Subject: Re: Requiem for OpenDoc Date: 1997/03/17 Message-ID: <5gjjal$1k5$1@ralph.vnet.net> X-Deja-AN: 226179186 References: <5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net><5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5ghtkv$lan@server1.erinet.com> <5gim25$2l@dopey.magg.net> Followup-To: comp.os.os2.programmer.misc,bit.listserv.os2-l,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.org.team-os2 Organization: Vnet Internet Access, Inc. - Charlotte, NC. (704) 374-0779 Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer.misc,bit.listserv.os2-l,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.org.team-os2