Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer.misc
Article #88Re: Requiem for OpenDoc
From: Erik Funkenbusch
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 1997 00:00
26 lines
2798 bytes
2798 bytes
In article <5h0hvn$aje@usenet88.supernews.com>, brian@anv.net wrote: >In <3333b6a9.0@usamrid.isd.net>, chucks@isd.net (Erik Funkenbusch) writes: > ><snip> > >>> Lets get with the listing... If you think you got enjoymnet out of my >>>above mistake, you ain't seen nothing compared to the enjoyment most of >>>this group will get out of your "list". I can't wait. C'mon, I corrected >>>my math mistake, lets see you produce on your claims. >> >>As soon as you list 10 products (not different versions of the same product) >>that were at least 3 months late I will. I provided the challenge, and I will > >>provide my end if you think you can provide yours. > > But you made the claim that most of their products ship on time >or early! And your challenge was in response to a challenge to your >claim! If I challenge your challenge to the challenge to your >original claim, is the ball back in your court? ;-) Yes, I stated that the vast majority of MS apps ship on time or early. This is not a challenge to that response. This is a challenge to my my statement that I can list 24 apps of which I will not do until Chris comes up with 10 apps (not different versions of the same app) that were more than 3 months late.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<33340f1c.0@usamrid.isd.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5ghtkv$lan@server1.erinet.com> <5gim25$2l@dopey.magg.net> <5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5ghtkv$lan@server1.erinet.com> <5gim25$2l@dopey.magg.net> <5gjjal$1k5$1@ralph.vnet.net> <5gjt3i$34a@dopey.magg.net> <5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5ghtkv$lan@server1.erinet.com> <5gim25$2l@dopey.magg.net> <5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5ghtkv$lan@server1.erinet.com> <5gim25$2l@dopey.magg.net> <5gjjal$1k5$1@ralph.vnet.net> <5gjt3i$34a@dopey.magg.net> <5glvgi$1bri$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5gmiuh$bfd@dopey.magg.net> <332f4c0c.0@usamrid.isd.net> <333008b1.0@news.essex1.com> <33305cf6.0@usamrid.isd.net> <5gsssh$bvk@lehi.kuentos.guam.net> <3332c3de.0@usamrid.isd.net> <3332cf92.0@news.essex1.com> <3333844e.0@usamrid.isd.net> <33339402.0@news.essex1.com> <3333b6a9.0@usamrid.isd.net> <5h0hvn$aje@usenet88.supernews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,6baa961c420547b0 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public X-Google-Thread: 1138ec,6baa961c420547b0 X-Google-Attributes: gid1138ec,public X-Google-Thread: 11307a,6baa961c420547b0 X-Google-Attributes: gid11307a,public From: chucks@isd.net (Erik Funkenbusch) Subject: Re: Requiem for OpenDoc Date: 1997/03/22 Message-ID: <33340f1c.0@usamrid.isd.net> X-Deja-AN: 227549762 References: <5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5ghtkv$lan@server1.erinet.com> <5gim25$2l@dopey.magg.net> <5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5ghtkv$lan@server1.erinet.com> <5gim25$2l@dopey.magg.net> <5gjjal$1k5$1@ralph.vnet.net> <5gjt3i$34a@dopey.magg.net> <5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5ghtkv$lan@server1.erinet.com> <5gim25$2l@dopey.magg.net> <5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5gcpte$291g$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5ghtkv$lan@server1.erinet.com> <5gim25$2l@dopey.magg.net> <5gjjal$1k5$1@ralph.vnet.net> <5gjt3i$34a@dopey.magg.net> <5glvgi$1bri$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5gmiuh$bfd@dopey.magg.net> <332f4c0c.0@usamrid.isd.net> <333008b1.0@news.essex1.com> <33305cf6.0@usamrid.isd.net> <5gsssh$bvk@lehi.kuentos.guam.net> <3332c3de.0@usamrid.isd.net> <3332cf92.0@news.essex1.com> <3333844e.0@usamrid.isd.net> <33339402.0@news.essex1.com> <3333b6a9.0@usamrid.isd.net> <5h0hvn$aje@usenet88.supernews.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer.misc,bit.listserv.os2-l,comp.os.os2.advocacy