🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <92Sep12.023824.23909@acs.ucalgary.ca> bauwens@acs.ucalgary.ca (Luc Bauwens) writes:

>I reran the dpara check under OS/2 2.0 on my machine with those flags
>-FPi87 -G2 -AL -Od, and surprise surprise, MS Fortran 5.1 came out
>with only one SERIOUS DEFECT (after milestone 160), and completed the
>test.
>
>But, BTW, for 1./0., the answer was, as before, 1.  And interestingly,
>Paranoia did not flag that as being a problem.
>
>(Dov: I could uuencode my dpara.exe and e-mail it to you.  That would
>let us establish whether the difference we note is between 5.0 and
>5.1 or between your and my machine.)
>
>Luc
>

Well, I checked the executable of Luc (thanks Luc!) on my machine
and it gave the same results as my executable: It crashed 2.0, but 
1.3 passes with 1 FLAW. I could not check under DOS, since the executable
was not bound. I tried to bind it with my libraries, but it failed 
to run under DOS with a runtime error.

So, this establishes that the difference in not caused by the difference
in compiler versions.

Dov