🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Aug24.172419.8032@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov> kaleb@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov (Kaleb Keithley) writes:
>I got the latest version and took it home.  I noted that this time
>it was zoo'd, rather than zip'd, so I located a copy of zoo and took
>it home too.
>

Future versions may be zip'd as part of my mistake in missing out some
of the headers was due to zoo's lack of a recursive pack capability.
Doing it by hand is too error prone.

>GCC/2.1 used the directories g++-include, gcc-include, and os2-include.
>
>GCC/2.2.2 uses g++-incl, gcc-incl, os2-incl.  That's okay, however,

Nope. Not the way I archived it.

>zoo refused to create files with with a '+' in the path.  I'm using
>the HPFS, and pkunpak didn't have this problem.  The copy of zoo that
>I have seems to be a D*S only version.  Typing 'zoo' from an OS/2 window
>pops up a DOS window and runs zoo there.

Ah, right. You need an OS/2 version.

>
>There must be an OS/2 version of zoo...   I used archie to locate the
>copy I have, and I didn't see anything that was overtly OS/2, or I
>would have grabbed it instead.  Anyone know where I can find such a
>beast?

ftp-os2.nmsu.edu:/pub/os2/all/archivers/zoo21e.exe (self unpacking).
This works under bith DOS and OS/2.

Trevor Lampre
<mmtl@cc.flinders.edu.au>