🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #1160

Re: malloc causes a segmentation violation!?

#1160
From: John J. Allen
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 09:27
24 lines
1400 bytes
harris@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu (Michael Harris) writes:
: mn87504@cs.tut.fi (Naatula Mika) writes:
: 
: >I thought that OS/2 could detect writes to non-allocated areas and
: >give me a segmentation fault right away.  Like it usually does. 
: 
: What you have to understand is that the area IS allocated as far as the
: operating system is concerned.  It is allocated to your process.  Since your
: process owns it, the operating system is very happy to let you write there.
: 
: Memory protection in OS/2 protects one process from another... not a process
: from itself.

OS/2 2.0 = Flat memory model
OS/2 1.x = Segmented memory model.

The segmented memory model had some advantages over the flat model. If I
used DosAllocSeg() to create a 20k block and then ran off the end of
it I'd get a segmentation violation as soon as I did that. (As in Win 3.x)

So although the FLAT memory model simplifies programming it hampers
debugging.

Well as they say "You can't have your cake and eat it too"
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Aug20.092700.8373@wsl.ie>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!ieunet!wsl!jja
References: <harris.714243433@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.lang.c
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!ieunet!wsl!jja
From: jja@wsl.ie (John J. Allen)
Subject: Re: malloc causes a segmentation violation!?
Message-ID: <1992Aug20.092700.8373@wsl.ie>
Organization: Project Papyrus, AIRAID, Dublin, Ireland
References: <harris.714243433@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 09:27:00 GMT
Lines: 25