Re: #define SEG_NONSHARED ?

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer

Article #1416

Back to comp.os.os2.programmer Previous Next

#1416

From: Kai-Uwe Rommel
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 1990 07:51

11 lines
1145 bytes

This value is mentioned in the OS/2 docs from MS and defined in the
headers which come with the SDK 1.1 and above. The headers from C 5.1
are 1.0 headers and out of date. Perhaps the C 6.0 headers are ok again.
I don`t have the headers handy now but can take a look at the docs later
which value SEG_NONSHARED has. I thought it is better to use symbolic
constants than hardcoded numbers. Probably the value is zero because
this case (nonshared segment) is the default case (?).

Kai Uwe Rommel
Munich
rommel@lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3345@tuminfo1.lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!usc!snorkelwacker!ira.uka.de!fauern!tumuc!lan!rommel

References: <1990Jul9.145902.29381@santra.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!usc!snorkelwacker!ira.uka.de!fauern!tumuc!lan!rommel
From: rommel@lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de (Kai-Uwe Rommel)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: #define SEG_NONSHARED ?
Message-ID: <3345@tuminfo1.lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de>
Date: 11 Jul 90 07:51:25 GMT
References: <1990Jul9.145902.29381@santra.uucp>
Sender: news@lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de
Reply-To: rommel@lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de (Kai-Uwe Rommel)
Organization: Inst. fuer Informatik, TU Muenchen, W. Germany
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message