Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #1533Re: OS/2 2.0 WHEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: scott e garfinkle
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 1990 15:28
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 1990 15:28
16 lines
1154 bytes
1154 bytes
In article <57655@microsoft.UUCP> steveha@microsoft.UUCP (Steve Hastings) writes: >In article <992@digi.lonestar.org> cfoughty@digi.lonestar.org (Cy Foughty) writes: >>I don't know what is taking so long.... > > >Well, I am not associated with the OS/2 development efforts, but I can think >of three reasons OS/2 should take longer than your project: > ... I can think of one much better reason: Microsoft has shifted resources out of the OS2 project. Presumably, this happened well in advance of the recent (infamous) "joint announcement". It does tend to push back release dates when you're not working on a project. -Scott E. Garfinkle I speak for nobody but myself.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Sep24.152851.27634@ingres.Ingres.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!oliveb!amdahl!rtech!ingres!segReferences:
<992@digi.lonestar.org> <57655@microsoft.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!oliveb!amdahl!rtech!ingres!seg From: seg@ingres.com (scott e garfinkle) Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0 WHEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Message-ID: <1990Sep24.152851.27634@ingres.Ingres.COM> Date: 24 Sep 90 15:28:51 GMT References: <992@digi.lonestar.org> <57655@microsoft.UUCP> Reply-To: seg@Ingres.COM (scott e garfinkle) Organization: Ingres Corp. Lines: 16