🚀 go-pugleaf

In <1992Nov4.152838.2341@nntp.hut.fi> Jaakko J Salmenius writes:
>Hi there,
>
>I have a problem considering about OS/2 1.2 queues.
>
>My idea is to implement a C++ class Queue whose Peek member function takes
>a parameter that indicates how long the functions should wait for a item to
>come into the queue.
>
>DosPeekQueue doesn't support this directly but it gives the user a choice
>between immediate return or waiting for a item to come. There is no
>wait-until-come-or-time-counts-up.
>
>The last parameter in DosPeekQueue function is a handle to the system semaphore
>or a address to the RAM semaphore. I desided to use that. I'm using RAM
>semaphores. My idea is first to call DosPeekQueue with no wait option so the
>functions will return right away in any case (there is a item or there is not).
>If the result code indicated that the queue was empty then the function
>waits for the semaphore to clear. This should happen every time a item enters
>into the queue.
>
>This is my code:
>
>ULONG Queue::Peek(
>        ...
>
>        ULONG semaphore = 0;
>
>        result = DosPeekQueue(
>                handle,
>                &resultStruct,
>                &messageSize,
>                (PULONG)&message,
>                &messageId,
>                DCWW_NOWAIT,
>                &tempPriority,
>                (ULONG)&semaphore);
>        if ((result == ERROR_QUE_ELEMENT_NOT_EXIST) ||
>                (result == ERROR_QUE_EMPTY))
>        {
>                DosSemWait(&semaphore, timeOut);
>                result = DosPeekQueue(
>                        handle,
>                        &resultStruct,
>                        &messageSize,
>                        (PULONG)&message,
>                        &messageId,
>                        DCWW_NOWAIT,
>                        &tempPriority,
>                        (ULONG)0);
>        }
>
>        ...
>
>The problem is that OS/2 doesn't clear the semaphore even if there is a item
>in the queue. So, what my program does is that it waits for the period of
>timeOut and DosSemWait returns ERROR_SEM_TIMEOUT.
>
>Is this the right way to use semaphores with queues?
>QuickHelp and printed documents doesn't tell much about the matter.
>
>I hope that Microsoft gives better documents with NT.
>
>                Jaakko
>--
>Jaakko Salmenius  | Helsinki University of Technology
>salmeniu@niksula.hut.fi     | The believable ski heroes, at least in my opinion,
>tel +358-0-805 5951    | are the ones who ski the extreme.
>

It doesn't look like you set the semaphore. Do you do that in the real
code? You should call DosSemSet before the first DosPeekQueue.

This queue-semaphore business is a bit tricky, and the docs have always been
a bit obscure about it.

Peter
--
Peter Forsberg           E-mail:  peterf@vnet.ibm.com          (primary)
                                  d88-pfo@nada.kth.se        (alternate)
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM