Re: GCC 2.1 or GCC 2.2.2?

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer

Article #1969

Back to comp.os.os2.programmer Previous Next

#1969

From: Colin Jensen
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 05:46

19 lines
1234 bytes

In article <1992Oct7.101842.10487@wsl.ie> jja@wsl.ie (John J. Allen) writes:
>Well I've just checked and the pragmas are there but they are wrong.
>There is a pack(4) prior to the FILEFINDBUF2 & FILEFINDBUF3 and it should
>be pack(2). This caused me about two hours wasted time trying to find this
>bug.

I was just trying to say that gcc has the ability to do alignment.  I
didn't mean to imply that the headers for gcc/2 are correct - because
they're not!

I have modified the headers that come with the Developer's Toolkit
to work correctly with gcc/2 but have not uploaded them anywhere
since someone had already said they would.  [Yes - this is legal]

Is someone else going to do this- or should I upload my version
of the headers?
-
Colin Jensen
cjensen@ampex.com	ljensen@netcom.netcom.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Oct9.054646.23053@netcom.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!ljensen

References: <1992Oct6.152907.7326@netcom.com> <1992Oct7.101842.10487@wsl.ie>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!ljensen
From: ljensen@netcom.com (Colin Jensen)
Subject: Re: GCC 2.1 or GCC 2.2.2?
Message-ID: <1992Oct9.054646.23053@netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
References: <1992Oct6.152907.7326@netcom.com> <1992Oct7.101842.10487@wsl.ie>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 05:46:46 GMT
Lines: 19

Reply to Parent Message