🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Oct12.183530.8733@networx.com>, mikel@networx.com (Mike Lempriere) writes:
> I've used Zortech with OS/2 1.3 for quite a while at work.
> The debugger is very powerful.  On extremely large programs, however,
> it is kinda slow.
> I recall my boss saying it doesn't work under OS/2 2.0  I've used
> both the compiler and debugger under 2.0 just fine -- I think he
> might have meant that the debugger won't deal with 32 bit code.

I also have been using Zortech to port an application from DOS/Windows to 1.3 (and
eventually to 2.0). The application uses XVT and was originally written in Borland
C++.  There are a lot of differences between the two (Borland works). I have tried
to run the Workbench under 2.0 and I do not have the use of the mouse. Since then,
I have stuck with make files (Zortech make appears to be a very minimal implementation).
I am waiting for the IBM C++ to come so that I can see what a difference this makes for
2.0.

simon