Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #2091Re: SOM compiler gotcha with implied metaclasses
From: David Charlap
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 18:18
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 18:18
16 lines
1414 bytes
1414 bytes
In article <Bw3EDL.MG5@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca> giguere@csg.uwaterloo.ca (Eric Giguere) writes: >Which brings me to my biggest beef about SOM as it currently stands: >If you make major changes to the CSC file, as you are liable to do >in the beginning stages of a system, it's hard to keep the corresponding >C files in sync with the CSC file, the example above being one of the >problems you'll run into. How hard is it to use separate compilation and keep most (if not all) of your own C code out of the files generated by the SOM compiler? This way, CSC files wouldn't munge any of your code. -- David Charlap |"there aren't 50,000 things for which it's worth writing dic5340@hertz.njit.edu| software; and the computer industry doesn't have enough ----------------------+ programmers to create that much good software. Therefore, most of it must be worthless" -- Boris Beizer "The Frozen Keyboard"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct15.181828.26332@njitgw.njit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!rutgers!njitgw.njit.edu!hertz.njit.edu!dic5340References:
<Bw3EDL.MG5@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!rutgers!njitgw.njit.edu!hertz.njit.edu!dic5340 From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap) Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer Subject: Re: SOM compiler gotcha with implied metaclasses Message-ID: <1992Oct15.181828.26332@njitgw.njit.edu> Date: 15 Oct 92 18:18:28 GMT References: <Bw3EDL.MG5@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca> Sender: news@njit.edu Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J. Lines: 16 Nntp-Posting-Host: hertz.njit.edu