Re: Are Workframe and CSet/2 useful?

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer

Article #2176

Back to comp.os.os2.programmer Previous Next

#2176

From: Steven Hayes
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 02:26

21 lines
1483 bytes

ignacij@meishan.animal.uiuc.edu (Ignacy Misztal) writes:

>I have recently received IBM CSet/2, which was ordered some time ago.
>Since I have acquired GCC in form of EMX 0.8d, which works quite well
>for me. As installing CSet/2 and learning Workframe seems
>to be time consuming, are these tools worth installing? To program
>for PM, is the included (printed + on-line) documentation sufficient
>or should one buy the full documentation?

Learning C Set/2 and workframe is a breeze. With the workframe, you 
don't need to know what all the compiler switches and things are - setting
options is as simple as presing radio buttons. Workframe also features
a rather good automatic makefile creation tool.
Doing compiles, builds, editing, and debugging is as simple as making menu
selections.

I'm extremely happy with the Workset/2 environment. It's only failing is the
lack of C++ support - and thats being addressed right now I understand.
-- 
   Steven Hayes                                    |  steveh@rmit.edu.au
   Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT)  |  +61 3 660-2693

Technical Details

Message-ID: <14756@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!goanna!steveh

References: <ignacij.717700018@meishan.animal.uiuc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!goanna!steveh
From: steveh@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au (Steven Hayes)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: Are Workframe and CSet/2 useful?
Message-ID: <14756@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au>
Date: 29 Sep 92 02:26:54 GMT
References: <ignacij.717700018@meishan.animal.uiuc.edu>
Organization: Comp Sci, RMIT, Melbourne, Australia
Lines: 21

Reply to Parent Message