🚀 go-pugleaf

atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil (Randall Atkinson) writes:

> In article <keld.718048707@login.dkuug.dk> keld@login.dkuug.dk (Keld J|rn Sim
> 
> >Well, maybe they were scheduled for standards track at some instance,
> >I have not paid that much attendance whether it would be an Internet
> >standard or not. The RFC status was what I was after.
> 
>   The above is a complete and total and blatant lie and the record
> clearly demonstrates that this is a lie.  Keld worked long and hard to
> try to politically manuver his RFC (then an I-D) into the standards
> track.  Ask ANYONE on the IESG.
> 
[more stuff deleted for the sake of brevity]

There have been some heated discussions among Keld, Atkinson, Nuggum et al
which mostly seem to be centering on Mr Keld's modus operandi rather than
any kind of technical discussion on 'character sets', which appears
on the subject line.

I have been wondering about the relevance of this discussion in c.o.o.p
which is one of the many newsgroups receiving the crosspostings. Can any
of the c.o.o.p regulars explain what this is all about?

Before this thread started, I was blissfully unaware of all the RFC's being
quoted, standards being bandied about. Does this require further research
for possible implications in Os/2 programming?

Just wondering.

GeSS
--
Gess Shankar      |<><>|Internet: gess@knex.Gwinnett.COM                |<><>|
Knowledge Exchange|<><>|{rutgers,ogicse,gatech}!emory!gwinnett!knex!gess|<><>|