🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <Bzy9pp.C8M@ecf.toronto.edu>, malone@ecf.toronto.edu (MALONE MATTHEW JAMES) writes:
> 
> see why I am wrong.  A structure where each element exceeds 64k with
> a thousand elements is a 64Meg structure.  It does not seem to me to 
> be unusual that OS/2 is trying to allocate a 64Meg slice of virtual
> memory which translates into a 64Meg addition to your swapper file.
> It seems natural that 20Meg of (free) disk space is not enough.  I


Matt is indeed right on the problem.  This may be the exact thing 
that happened.  But what I am actually concern about is whether
there is a such a bug in gcc in general.  I read about this in 
linux newsgroup but nobody address it anymore.

I read this news just when I was having that problem so I carelessly
assume it is device problem but not user's problem ( oops! )

Thanks anyway.  So, anyone know about that may be gcc problem?


Yang, Che Kan
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
uucp:     ...!{allegra,amd,hplabs,ut-ngp}!gatech!prism!gt3968a
Internet: gt3968a@prism.gatech.edu
          ayang@math.gatech.edu