Re: CSet/2 vs. Watcom C?

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer

Article #2736

Back to comp.os.os2.programmer Previous Next

#2736

From: Larry Salomon Jr.
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 15:16

14 lines
954 bytes

In <1992Dec30.222721.29697@samba.oit.unc.edu> Brandon.Vanevery@launchpad.unc.edu (Brandon Vanevery) writes:

>Which compiler is "better" for OS/2 programming?  Why?  Is there even any
>contest?

We've tried both and I prefer C Set/2.  We had problems getting the Watcom
debugger (WVIDEO) to work and Tech Support wasn't able to help much.

Cheers,
Q
-- 
"If you choose not to decide, you  | "My other body is in the shop" - seen
 still have made a choice" - Rush  |  on a T-shirt
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Dec31.151613.17947@panix.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!concert!rutgers!cmcl2!panix!os2man

References: <1992Dec30.222721.29697@samba.oit.unc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!concert!rutgers!cmcl2!panix!os2man
From: os2man@panix.com (Larry Salomon Jr.)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: CSet/2 vs. Watcom C?
Message-ID: <1992Dec31.151613.17947@panix.com>
Date: 31 Dec 92 15:16:13 GMT
References: <1992Dec30.222721.29697@samba.oit.unc.edu>
Distribution: na
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix, NYC
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message