Re: CSet/2 vs. Watcom C?

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer

Article #2761

Back to comp.os.os2.programmer Previous Next

#2761

From: Michael C. Cambria
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1993 20:10

21 lines
1354 bytes

In article <1992Dec31.151613.17947@panix.com>, os2man@panix.com (Larry Salomon Jr.) writes...
>In <1992Dec30.222721.29697@samba.oit.unc.edu> Brandon.Vanevery@launchpad.unc.edu (Brandon Vanevery) writes:
> 
>>Which compiler is "better" for OS/2 programming?  Why?  Is there even any
>>contest?
> 
>We've tried both and I prefer C Set/2.  We had problems getting the Watcom
>debugger (WVIDEO) to work and Tech Support wasn't able to help much.
> 
>Cheers,
>Q
>-- 
>"If you choose not to decide, you  | "My other body is in the shop" - seen
> still have made a choice" - Rush  |  on a T-shirt
>------------------------------------------------------------------------

wvideo needs to run from full screen os/2 for it to work in the
routine(s) dispatched to from the message loop.

/Mike

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1993Jan3.210959.25788@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!news!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!smaug.enet.dec.com!cambria

References: <1992Dec30.222721.29697@samba.oit.unc.edu> <1992Dec31.151613.17947@panix.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!news!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!smaug.enet.dec.com!cambria
From: cambria@smaug.enet.dec.com (Michael C. Cambria)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: CSet/2 vs. Watcom C?
Message-ID: <1993Jan3.210959.25788@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>
Date: 3 Jan 93 20:10:12 GMT
References: <1992Dec30.222721.29697@samba.oit.unc.edu> <1992Dec31.151613.17947@panix.com>
Sender: usenet@nntpd.lkg.dec.com (USENET News System)
Distribution: na
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 21

Reply to Parent Message