🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #2835

Where is getch()?!??

#2835
From: Ian Ameline
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 18:57
28 lines
1699 bytes
In article <1992Dec11.034713.14594@lugb.latrobe.edu.au>,
cscks@luxury.latrobe.edu.au (Kamal Shaker.) writes:
>
>I'm using C set/2 and whenever I use getch() to read a character
>( from a full screen OS/2 session ) the link gives me unresolved external,
>I included conio.h and stdio.h. It is in the neader files, but not
>in the .des files in the lib directory.... I really need to read
>one character at a time with extended keyboard support.
>Is there a way to fix this?? Or the the characters another way?!?
>
>Thanks is advance ( and for the answers to the other questions.. )
>

   Make sure you have the migration libraries installed, and use /Sm.
That should make it work.

Regards,
Ian.
>--
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Kamal Shaker,        | cscks@luxury.latrobe.edu.au or shaker@latcs1.lat.oz.au
>Student Vax Cluster, | %SYSTEM-F-EXQUOTA, Alcohol quota exceeded,
>La Trobe Uni,        | stomach dumped.
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>There's enough water on earth to drown the human population 87.6 million times
>
  Oh Oh -- Better ban water. You can't use that old argument -- Water
doesn't drown people -- people drown people. :-)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <19921214.105832.634@almaden.ibm.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!vnet.ibm.com
References: <1992Dec11.034713.14594@lugb.latrobe.edu.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!vnet.ibm.com
From: ameline@vnet.ibm.com (Ian Ameline)
Message-ID: <19921214.105832.634@almaden.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 92 13:57:59 EST
Subject: Where is getch()?!??
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
References: <1992Dec11.034713.14594@lugb.latrobe.edu.au>
Organization: C-Set/2 Development, IBM Canada Lab.
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
Lines: 28