Re: OS/2 libraries thread-safe ?

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer

Article #2922

Back to comp.os.os2.programmer Previous Next

#2922

From: Tim Francis
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 21:45

11 lines
969 bytes

In article <BzF43K.Fsq@ecf.toronto.edu>,
kumarad@ecf.toronto.edu (KUMARADAS JOSEPH CARL) writes:
>
>While the MS libraries have some functions which are non-rentrant, the IBM
>CSet/2 libraries are all re-entrant from what I understand.
>
>Carl.

Close: All the C Set/2 functions are either re-entrant, or protected
by semaphores internally.  You can essentially treat every function as
though it were re-entrant.   -tim

Technical Details

Message-ID: <19921217.134609.553@almaden.ibm.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!vnet.ibm.com

References: <1992Dec16.221352.26031@cs.tu-berlin.de> <1992Dec17.094108.12612@eua.ericsson.se> <BzF43K.Fsq@ecf.toronto.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!vnet.ibm.com
From: francis@vnet.ibm.com (Tim Francis)
Message-ID: <19921217.134609.553@almaden.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 16:45:29 EST
Subject: Re: OS/2 libraries thread-safe ?
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
References: <1992Dec16.221352.26031@cs.tu-berlin.de> <1992Dec17.094108.12612@eua.ericsson.se> <BzF43K.Fsq@ecf.toronto.edu>
Reply-To: francis@vnet.ibm.com
Organization: IBM Canada Lab, WorkFrame/2 development
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message