Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #3039WorkFrame/2 problem
From: Tim Francis
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 23:19
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 23:19
26 lines
1797 bytes
1797 bytes
In article <19NOV92.12501962@wl.aecl.ca>, tranx@wl.aecl.ca writes: > >Subj: Problem with WorkFrame on OS/2 > >I am using WorkFrame/2 for wirting an application for OS/2. But everytime >I go to option "Action" and select "Make". I receive the error message like >"Unable to open message file". I don't know why. I put c:\ibmc\bin,c:\toolkt20\ >os2bin , set include=c:\toolkt20\os2h;c:\ibmc\include in the path. And I also >run "csetenv.cmd" to make sure the path was set-up right. But it doesn't help. >Could anybody help me out? Thanks > "Unable to open message file" when running what command? NMAKE itself, or some command (ICC) started by NMAKE? If you're not sure your environment is setup correctly, create a TEST.CMD file, containing only "SET". Add that as a background tool, and run it -- it will list the entire environment. You should be able to use that information, together with which tool is actually failing, to narrow down the cause. One possibility: You say you're running CSETENV to set the environment up -- are you then starting WorkFrame from the same session (which is correct), or are you running CSETENV in one window, and then starting WorkFrame from another, or from the icon (which would be incorrect, in this case -- you have to start it from where the environment has been setup). -tim
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19921119.152348.270@almaden.ibm.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!vnet.ibm.comReferences:
<19NOV92.12501962@wl.aecl.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!vnet.ibm.com From: francis@vnet.ibm.com (Tim Francis) Message-ID: <19921119.152348.270@almaden.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 18:19:53 EST Subject: WorkFrame/2 problem Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer References: <19NOV92.12501962@wl.aecl.ca> Reply-To: francis@vnet.ibm.com Organization: IBM Canada Lab, WorkFrame/2 development Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM Lines: 26