🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #322

Which C, which assembler?

#322
From: Samuel A. Figueroa
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 04:29
15 lines
1342 bytes
I am sure this question has been asked before, but I just recently started
reading this newsgroup, and the "programmer's" faq I saw a while back didn't
seem to provide much guidance.  I am looking for a C compiler and an assem-
bler for OS/2 2.0.  I know there are two ports of gcc, both of which are free.
Apart from these, which other ones are there, and what are their advantages
and disadvantages (including both gcc ports)?  I am not so interested in C++.
I figure I can use gcc if I ever need to do something with C++.  As for the
assembler, I have Microsoft Macro Assembler 5.1, which is old.  I would like
something that can be used to develop DOS as well as OS/2 2.0 programs, though
I guess I can always use the assembler I currently have for DOS.  I would like
to get these by the end of the month.
------------
Sam Figueroa (figueroa@cs.nyu.edu)
This is not a .signature virus.
Do NOT copy me into your .signature file!
Technical Details
Message-ID: <9208100429.AA25305@SPUNKY.CS.NYU.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!yale.edu!cmcl2!SPUNKY.CS.NYU.EDU!figueroa

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!yale.edu!cmcl2!SPUNKY.CS.NYU.EDU!figueroa
From: figueroa@SPUNKY.CS.NYU.EDU (Samuel A. Figueroa)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Which C, which assembler?
Message-ID: <9208100429.AA25305@SPUNKY.CS.NYU.EDU>
Date: 10 Aug 92 04:29:52 GMT
Sender: daemon@cmcl2.nyu.edu (Mr Background)
Organization: New York University
Lines: 15