Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #340Re: Which C, which assembler?
From: Michael D Kretzer
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 20:42
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 20:42
19 lines
1907 bytes
1907 bytes
From article <9208100429.AA25305@SPUNKY.CS.NYU.EDU>, by figueroa@SPUNKY.CS.NYU.EDU (Samuel A. Figueroa): > I am sure this question has been asked before, but I just recently started > reading this newsgroup, and the "programmer's" faq I saw a while back didn't > seem to provide much guidance. I am looking for a C compiler and an assem- > bler for OS/2 2.0. I know there are two ports of gcc, both of which are free. > Apart from these, which other ones are there, and what are their advantages > and disadvantages (including both gcc ports)? I am not so interested in C++. > I figure I can use gcc if I ever need to do something with C++. As for the > assembler, I have Microsoft Macro Assembler 5.1, which is old. I would like > something that can be used to develop DOS as well as OS/2 2.0 programs, though > I guess I can always use the assembler I currently have for DOS. I would like > to get these by the end of the month. I would suggest upgrading your MASM 5.1 to MASM 6.0, which directly supports OS/2 2.0 and the flat memory model (OS/2 2.0 issues with MASM 6.0 is even mentioned in the manual). The libraries for OS/2 2.0 are NOT included with the package, however...I would suggest purchasing IBM's Toolkit to get the header files/libraries. MASM 6.0 is the best Assembler out right now for OS/2 (one of very few, unfortunately).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug10.204209.10251@uwm.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!mips!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!tanithReferences:
<9208100429.AA25305@SPUNKY.CS.NYU.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!mips!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!tanith From: tanith@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Michael D Kretzer) Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer Subject: Re: Which C, which assembler? Message-ID: <1992Aug10.204209.10251@uwm.edu> Date: 10 Aug 92 20:42:09 GMT References: <9208100429.AA25305@SPUNKY.CS.NYU.EDU> Sender: news@uwm.edu (USENET News System) Reply-To: tanith@csd4.csd.uwm.edu Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Lines: 19 Originator: tanith@csd4.csd.uwm.edu