🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #340

Re: Which C, which assembler?

#340
From: Michael D Kretzer
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 20:42
19 lines
1907 bytes
From article <9208100429.AA25305@SPUNKY.CS.NYU.EDU>, by figueroa@SPUNKY.CS.NYU.EDU (Samuel A. Figueroa):
> I am sure this question has been asked before, but I just recently started
> reading this newsgroup, and the "programmer's" faq I saw a while back didn't
> seem to provide much guidance.  I am looking for a C compiler and an assem-
> bler for OS/2 2.0.  I know there are two ports of gcc, both of which are free.
> Apart from these, which other ones are there, and what are their advantages
> and disadvantages (including both gcc ports)?  I am not so interested in C++.
> I figure I can use gcc if I ever need to do something with C++.  As for the
> assembler, I have Microsoft Macro Assembler 5.1, which is old.  I would like
> something that can be used to develop DOS as well as OS/2 2.0 programs, though
> I guess I can always use the assembler I currently have for DOS.  I would like
> to get these by the end of the month.

I would suggest upgrading your MASM 5.1 to MASM 6.0, which directly supports
OS/2 2.0 and the flat memory model (OS/2 2.0 issues with MASM 6.0 is even 
mentioned in the manual).  The libraries for OS/2 2.0 are NOT included with
the package, however...I would suggest purchasing IBM's Toolkit to get the
header files/libraries.  MASM 6.0 is the best Assembler out right now for
OS/2 (one of very few, unfortunately).
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Aug10.204209.10251@uwm.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!mips!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!tanith
References: <9208100429.AA25305@SPUNKY.CS.NYU.EDU>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!mips!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!tanith
From: tanith@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Michael D Kretzer)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: Which C, which assembler?
Message-ID: <1992Aug10.204209.10251@uwm.edu>
Date: 10 Aug 92 20:42:09 GMT
References: <9208100429.AA25305@SPUNKY.CS.NYU.EDU>
Sender: news@uwm.edu (USENET News System)
Reply-To: tanith@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Lines: 19
Originator: tanith@csd4.csd.uwm.edu