🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #3424

Microsoft code (Re: Why you should .....)

#3424
From: Wen-Chun Ni
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 22:43
14 lines
1120 bytes
What I believe is that no code is not rewritable to have the same
interface. The problem of OS/2's drivers turns out to be Microsoft's
ownership of those driver sources. This is unimaginable, especially for
a big company like IBM. Maybe I am too naive (or too stupid) to say the
above words. But, anyone from IBM can give the reason why, after near 8
months, IBM still has to deal with the driver source code with
Microsoft?



Wen-Chun Ni, wcn@cs.brown.edu         (401) 863-7669
-------------------------------------------------------------------
 I do more after 2 a.m. than most people do all day.
			 - from a T-shirt given by a friend.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Jan10.224341.2700@cs.brown.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!brunix!brunix!wcn
References: <4870@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us> <1993Jan10.065318.8344@netcom.com> <4900@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!brunix!brunix!wcn
From: wcn@cs.brown.edu (Wen-Chun Ni)
Subject: Microsoft code (Re: Why you should .....)
Message-ID: <1993Jan10.224341.2700@cs.brown.edu>
Sender: news@cs.brown.edu
Organization: Brown University Department of Computer Science
References: <4870@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us> <1993Jan10.065318.8344@netcom.com> <4900@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 22:43:41 GMT
Lines: 14