Re: Borland C++: what a dog.

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer

Article #3619

Back to comp.os.os2.programmer Previous Next

#3619

From: Rudynell S. Millian
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 14:33

22 lines
1467 bytes

In article <CFORTIER.93Jan21152045@genghis.news> cfortier@genghis.news (Chris Fortier) writes:
>
>|	   It is just too bad Borland doesn't take OS/2 seriously. Here is an 
>|   opportunity for Borland to set a standard and run away with the market, and 
>|   they are going to blow it!
>
>
>Au contraire, Borland takes this product very seriously.  How in the world do
>you think Borland is going to "blow it?"  You must be careful about such
>blanket statements.  How can you criticize that which you have not used nor
>seen?!
>
>
>Chris

	Well Borland has certainly not made it easy for prospective customers
to take a peek at the product. No formal feature list has been made available.
The EEP is an incredible $300! I have broused the article on BC++ for OS/2 
in the OS/2 developer magazine, and I don't recall it being said that there
wasn't going to be an OWL equivalent. 
	I don't know about anybody else, but I guess I will be looking
somewhere else, i.e. IBM's Cset/2 c++.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1993Jan25.143311.27860@cci632.cci.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!rutgers!rochester!rit!cci632!rom

References: <CFORTIER.93Jan19164316@genghis.news> <1993Jan20.140136.8695@cci632.cci.com> <CFORTIER.93Jan21152045@genghis.news>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!rutgers!rochester!rit!cci632!rom
From: rom@cci632.cci.com (Rudynell S. Millian)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: Borland C++: what a dog.
Message-ID: <1993Jan25.143311.27860@cci632.cci.com>
Date: 25 Jan 93 14:33:11 GMT
References: <CFORTIER.93Jan19164316@genghis.news> <1993Jan20.140136.8695@cci632.cci.com> <CFORTIER.93Jan21152045@genghis.news>
Organization: [Computer Consoles, Inc., Rochester, NY
Lines: 22

Reply to Parent Message