🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #3627

Re: emx 0.8f bug or not?

#3627
From: Kai-Uwe Rommel
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:24
16 lines
1232 bytes
In article <1993Jan25.114723.13999@donau.et.tudelft.nl> linstee@dutecaj.et.tudelft.nl (Erik van Linstee) writes:
>Has anybody noticed compiling with -Zomf -Zmt leaves about 4k
>worth of debug info? It may be a variable amount, but some
>stuff I recompiled was about 4k larger than with emx 0.8e.
>So what is wrong here?
  
Nothing is wrong. A new feature of emx 0.8f is that it supports a subset
of debug info even with -Zomf format (for use with IBM's IPMD debugger).
To get rid of it, just link with -s as usual for a.out format.

Kai Uwe Rommel

/* Kai Uwe Rommel --- rommel@informatik.tu-muenchen.de */

DOS ... is still a real mode only non-reentrant interrupt
handler, and always will be.                -Russell Williams
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Jan25.172401.20997@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!math.fu-berlin.de!informatik.tu-muenchen.de!rommel
References: <1993Jan25.114723.13999@donau.et.tudelft.nl>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!math.fu-berlin.de!informatik.tu-muenchen.de!rommel
From: rommel@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Kai-Uwe Rommel)
Subject: Re: emx 0.8f bug or not?
References: <1993Jan25.114723.13999@donau.et.tudelft.nl>
Sender: news@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (USENET Newssystem)
Organization: Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Germany
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:24:01 GMT
Message-ID: <1993Jan25.172401.20997@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE>
Lines: 17