Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #500Re: Can someone at IBM please explain why developers should develop for OS/2?
From: dave
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 14:22
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 14:22
37 lines
2616 bytes
2616 bytes
In <1992Jul24.182822.24148@hellgate.utah.edu> Brian Sturgill writes:
> I had assumed that with the beta tools, that they were slow because of debug
> code... Wrong... this compiler's a dog.
I can't comment on your comments about support, ordering, or NFS, but I
can comment on compiler stuff. The problem with the compiler is not that
it's a dog, the problem is that it's a pig: it likes to have lots and
lots of memory available. We're fixing that, though. The first CSD
features a performance improvement of around 10%, and the next CSD will
have significant improvements in working-set size, which will lead to
better swapper behaviour. Some of our preliminary tests show compile-
time improvements of around 25% over the first CSD on small machines.
We'll let you know when this is available. In the mean time, you'll see
big improvements if you jack your machine up to 16M of RAM. I know that
this is a poor way to fix the compiler's memory allocation problems, but
it *will* give you fast relief.
> Also in June... the projects mostly there... I turn on the optimizer...
> Gak!!! it screws up loop expression-extraction optimization.
> I loose a week trying to get around the problems... decide I'll just have
> to live without optimization... I don't call IBM!!! -- I'd lose another week.
How do you expect us to fix bugs if you don't tell us what they are?
Build a preprocessed version of your program with the failing code (ie,
compile with -P), and send the resulting .I file to cset2@vnet.ibm.com
along with a covering note telling us where to look for the problem and
we'll open up an APAR and get this fixed in an upcoming CSD. And btw,
this goes for anyone else with a C Set/2 question, kudo, or complaint...
cset2@vnet.ibm.com is your 24-hour a day hotline to the C Set/2
developers, workframe@vnet.ibm.com for Workframe/2.
dave
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave Mooney dmm@vnet.ibm.com
C Set/2 Development, IBM Canada Lab, 844 Don Mills Rd, Toronto, Ontario
"If you've got a blacklist, I want to be on it"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19920727.074908.103@almaden.ibm.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!vnet.ibm.comReferences:
<1992Jul24.182822.24148@hellgate.utah.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!vnet.ibm.com From: dmm@vnet.ibm.com (dave) Message-ID: <19920727.074908.103@almaden.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 10:22:57 EDT Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer Subject: Re: Can someone at IBM please explain why developers should develop for OS/2? Organization: IBM Canada Lab News-Software: UReply 3.0 X-X-From: dmm@vnet.ibm.com (Dave Mooney) References: <1992Jul24.182822.24148@hellgate.utah.edu> Lines: 37