🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <pathak-270792091637@virtual.mitre.org> pathak@mitre.org (Heeren Pathak) writes:
>In article <1992Jul24.201426.5137@chpc.utexas.edu>, apas611@chpc.utexas.edu
>(David Boles) wrote:
>> 
>> It seems that security in the orange book sense doesn't make much sense
>> for most folks however.  It focuses on things like loss or alteration
>> of information.  While these things are certainly important, for most
>
>I think loss or alteration of information is very important for most folks.
> Computer related fraud is a multi-billion dollar problem.  If businesses
>took security a bit more seriously, they could probably prevent a fair
>amount of the fraud.  Unfortunately, most corporations either unwilling to
>pay the price it takes or don't have the personnel who understand security
>issues.
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Heeren Pathak                      | Television is a device that permits
>pathak@mitre.org                   | people who haven't anything to do to
>Mitre Corporation                  | watch people who can't do anything.
>(617) 271-7465                     |	               	-- Fred Allen
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sorry, I must not have made myself clear.  I am not saying that loss or
alteration of information is unimportant.  Rather, I am pointing out
that that is just about _all_ that the Orange Book addresses.  Security
for most people should address all the stuff (well most) of the stuff
in the Orange Book _plus_ availability issues (and others).

Cheers,

David Boles