🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #505

Re: Can someone at IBM please explain why developers should develop for OS/2?

#505
From: David Shepherd
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 16:43
18 lines
1515 bytes
In article <19920727.074908.103@almaden.ibm.com>, dmm@vnet.ibm.com (dave) writes:
>we'll open up an APAR and get this fixed in an upcoming CSD.  And btw,
>this goes for anyone else with a C Set/2 question, kudo, or complaint...
>cset2@vnet.ibm.com is your 24-hour a day hotline to the C Set/2
>developers, workframe@vnet.ibm.com for Workframe/2.

are there other email addresses for problems/bugs in other bits
of OS/2  ...  if so can we know so we can help.  (e.g. i'd feel
much happier if i felt someone knew of the fact that the 10x6 and
12x5 font sizes in OS/2 windows are broke on my set up and that,
assuming its a bug, something's being done to mend it)

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
david shepherd: des@inmos.co.uk or des@inmos.com    tel: 0454-616616 x 625
                inmos ltd, 1000 aztec west, almondsbury, bristol, bs12 4sq
		"i speak latin to god,   spanish to men,   french to women 
		 and german to my horse."             - charles v of spain
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Jul27.174327.9457@wraxall.inmos.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!inmos!wraxall.inmos.co.uk!frogland.inmos.co.uk!des
References: <1992Jul24.182822.24148@hellgate.utah.edu> <19920727.074908.103@almaden.ibm.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!inmos!wraxall.inmos.co.uk!frogland.inmos.co.uk!des
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: des@frogland.inmos.co.uk (David Shepherd)
Subject: Re: Can someone at IBM please explain why developers should develop for OS/2?
Message-ID: <1992Jul27.174327.9457@wraxall.inmos.co.uk>
Organization: INMOS architecture group
References: <1992Jul24.182822.24148@hellgate.utah.edu> <19920727.074908.103@almaden.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 17:43:27 BST
Lines: 18