Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #545Re: Can someone at IBM please explain why developers should develop for OS/2?
From: Tom J Parry
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 06:37
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 06:37
46 lines
3004 bytes
3004 bytes
brian%jensen.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Brian Sturgill) writes: : : : Below is a response to two different individuals from IBM. : I wish to thank them both for responding to my original post. : [ stuff deleted] : > - You say that we should have made available, from day 1, a development : > environment "WITH ALL THE PROGRAMMING DOCS (at least on-line), and : > the hard copies of docs AT COST." : > Correct me if I've misunderstood you, but the programming docs are : > provided (on-line) with the toolkit (part of the WorkSet). Look in : > your toolkit folder, under "Toolkit information". -tim : What I'm talking about is the overview manuals. The reference : manuals are there, but the other things are not. : Further the help system makes it very hard to print things out, it's : more or less the whole huge document, or a "page" at a time. What I'd give to Tech manuals ! (not a lot of money :-)) I bought the Redbooks yesterday and was a little dissapointed - what I got were the overview manuals, when what I really wanted were the tech refs - oh well. Can't winge, since they'll probably be usefull at some stage in the future. You are right though - a decent C++ developement system IS necessary, since a lot of people have put a lot of time into creating reusable objects to save themselves and others time during the developement phase - but can't use them because there is no decent C++ compiler. As a small time developer/consultant and big time student, I find the costs involved in the OS/compiler debate prohibitive. As a student, I want to use OS/2 as a system which gives comparable performance and is reasonably compatible with the UNIX environments I use here at Uni. As a developer I would like to create applications for the various jobs I'm working in in a superior environment, like OS2. Unfortunatly it looks like I'll have to wait until Borland release BC++ 4.0. Something I noticed out here in Australia was that the MS developement conference cost $400 and included 3 CD-ROMs full of stuff. From what I here this was good value. I recently recieved an invitation to the OS2 developers conference. Base cost ~$800 and you get a few bits and peices for it (a current release copy of OS/2 2.x and some other goodies). Nowehere near as much as MS offered. -- Tom J Parry. Your reality is a figment of my imagination.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul29.063704.18222@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!monu6!yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au!parryReferences:
<1992Jul28.021436.2865@hellgate.utah.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!monu6!yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au!parry From: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Tom J Parry) Subject: Re: Can someone at IBM please explain why developers should develop for OS/2? Message-ID: <1992Jul29.063704.18222@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> Originator: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au Sender: news@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (Usenet system) Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia. References: <1992Jul28.021436.2865@hellgate.utah.edu> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 06:37:04 GMT Lines: 46