🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #545

Re: Can someone at IBM please explain why developers should develop for OS/2?

#545
From: Tom J Parry
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 06:37
46 lines
3004 bytes
brian%jensen.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Brian Sturgill) writes:
: 
: 
: Below is a response to two different individuals from IBM.
: I wish to thank them both for responding to my original post.
: [ stuff deleted]
: >  - You say that we should have made available, from day 1, a development
: >    environment "WITH ALL THE PROGRAMMING DOCS (at least on-line), and
: >    the hard copies of docs AT COST."
: >      Correct me if I've misunderstood you, but the programming docs are
: >      provided (on-line) with the toolkit (part of the WorkSet).  Look in
: >      your toolkit folder, under "Toolkit information".    -tim
: What I'm talking about is the overview manuals.  The reference
: manuals are there, but the other things are not.
: Further the help system makes it very hard to print things out, it's
: more or less the whole huge document, or a "page" at a time.

What I'd give to Tech manuals ! (not a lot of money :-)) I bought the Redbooks
yesterday and was a little dissapointed - what I got were the overview manuals,
when what I really wanted were the tech refs - oh well. Can't winge, since 
they'll probably be usefull at some stage in the future.

You are right though - a decent C++ developement system IS necessary, since
a lot of people have put a lot of time into creating reusable objects to save
themselves and others time during the developement phase - but can't use them
because there is no decent C++ compiler.

As a small time developer/consultant and big time student, I find the costs 
involved in the OS/compiler debate prohibitive. As a student, I want to use
OS/2 as a system which gives comparable performance and is reasonably 
compatible with the UNIX environments I use here at Uni. As a developer
I would like to create applications for the various jobs I'm working in
in a superior environment, like OS2. Unfortunatly it looks like I'll have to
wait until Borland release BC++ 4.0.

Something I noticed out here in Australia was that the MS developement 
conference cost $400 and included 3 CD-ROMs full of stuff. From what I here 
this was good value. I recently recieved an invitation to the OS2 developers
conference. Base cost ~$800 and you get a few bits and peices for it
(a current release copy of OS/2 2.x and some other goodies). Nowehere near
as much as MS offered.


-- 
Tom J Parry.
Your reality is a figment of my imagination.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Jul29.063704.18222@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!monu6!yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au!parry
References: <1992Jul28.021436.2865@hellgate.utah.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!monu6!yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au!parry
From: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Tom J Parry)
Subject: Re: Can someone at IBM please explain why developers should develop for OS/2?
Message-ID: <1992Jul29.063704.18222@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au>
Originator: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au
Sender: news@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (Usenet system)
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
References: <1992Jul28.021436.2865@hellgate.utah.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 06:37:04 GMT
Lines: 46