🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #588

Re: Can someone at IBM please explain why developers should develop for OS/2?

#588
From: Ian Ameline
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 17:30
22 lines
1470 bytes
In article <1992Jul28.021436.2865@hellgate.utah.edu>,
brian%jensen.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Brian Sturgill) writes:
> [Lots of stuff -- deleted -- sample code included.

   Brian,

   Thanks for the sample reproducing the bug. I have reproduced it on
my machine, and we'll try to get a fix to you ASAP. (Likely sometime
next week) In the mean time, if you make isbad volatile, it works.
The optimizer isn't completely bug free (what program is?), but there
are usually easy work-arounds. We will do everything we can to fix bugs
that are reported as fast as possible. Sending them to CSet2@vnet.ibm.com
is probably the fastest way to get them to us. I'd really appreciate
it if you could send those C files where you noticed such a noticable
performance difference. We are very interested in doing something about
it.

Regards,
Ian Ameline,
C-Set/2 Development.
P.S. I monitor section 10 on OS2DEV on compuserve, and will take bug
reports there too.my ID is 70400,2356.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <19920730.103030.71@almaden.ibm.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!vnet.ibm.com
References: <1992Jul28.021436.2865@hellgate.utah.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!vnet.ibm.com
From: ameline@vnet.ibm.com (Ian Ameline)
Message-ID: <19920730.103030.71@almaden.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 92 13:30:00 EDT
Subject: Re: Can someone at IBM please explain why developers should develop for OS/2?
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
References: <1992Jul28.021436.2865@hellgate.utah.edu>
Organization: C-Set/2 Development, IBM Canada Lab.
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
Lines: 22