🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #755

Re: OS/2 vs NT features list, Revision 1.6

#755
From: MLONG
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 1992 15:36
33 lines
3253 bytes
In article <1992Sep5.012500.2098@hellgate.utah.edu>                             
brian%jaguar.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Brian Sturgill) writes:                   
                                                                                
>OS/2 LAN Server 2.0 Advanced Package (Not available for OS/2 2.0 yet)          
>	(Includes features of Entry Package above.)                                   
>	Local security                                                                
>@	Remote maintenance support                                                   
>	higher throughput.                                                            
>	Fault tolerance (disk duplexing and disk mirroring)                           
>!	Cost: ???                                                                    
>                                                                               
>OS/2 LAN Sever 3.0 (Due by year end)                                           
>	(Of course all the features from above)                                       
>	Clients can do peer-to-peer file and printer sharing.                         
>!		Anybody know the level of security?                                         
                                                                                
The level of security for a LAN Server is the same as LAN Server 2.0 Adv. - loc 
al security is available.  The level of security for the peer services at this  
time is either a user level security or a share level security.  UPM on the pee 
r machine is used for the user level security, and a password must be supplied  
with the net use command if using share level security.  A peer servers securit 
y compares very much to a LAN Server 2.0 Entry.                                 
                                                                                
>	Built-in TCP/IP                                                               
                                                                                
I might term this'Support for running LAN Server over TCP/IP?',after reading th 
e beta docs, unless things change.                                              
                                                                                
>	Advanced version works under 2.0.                                             
>!	Cost: ???                                                                    
                                                                                
Mike Long                                                                       
Iowa State University                                                           
Technical Details
Message-ID: <168598717.MLONG@isucard.card.iastate.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!news.iastate.edu!isucard.card.iastate.edu!MLONG
References: <1992Sep5.012500.2098@hellgate.utah.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.win32
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!news.iastate.edu!isucard.card.iastate.edu!MLONG
From: MLONG@isucard.card.iastate.edu
Subject: Re: OS/2 vs NT features list, Revision 1.6
Message-ID: <168598717.MLONG@isucard.card.iastate.edu>
Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: CARD
References:  <1992Sep5.012500.2098@hellgate.utah.edu>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 15:36:21 GMT
Lines: 33