Re: C++ Compiler for OS/2, which is NOT GNIU

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer

Article #825

Back to comp.os.os2.programmer Previous Next

#825

From: Ian Ameline
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1992 22:45

19 lines
1308 bytes

In article <_yqnl!m.feustel@netcom.com>,
feustel@netcom.com (David Feustel) writes:
>
>My understanding is that the IBM C++ compiler is already done, but IBM
>agreed with Borland  not to announce its C++ compiler until after
>Borland announces its own 32-bit C++ compiler for OS/2.
>--

   Your understanding is completely disconnected with reality. If we're
done, why are we (C++ Development) still working so hard? We'd **love**
beat Borland to market! Just FYI, IBM Canada (developers of C and C++
for OS/2) has no agrements with Borland about anything, possibly
excepting a non disclosure agreement our performance analysis team might
have signed in order to get their hands on the Borland Beta C++, in order
to measure it's performance against the (almost complete) IBM C++
compiler.

Regards,
Ian.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <19920907.154445.51@almaden.ibm.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!vnet.ibm.com

References: <4MS6CQW@netmbx.netmbx.de> <5wqn93g.xtifr@netcom.com> <_yqnl!m.feustel@netcom.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!vnet.ibm.com
From: ameline@vnet.ibm.com (Ian Ameline)
Message-ID: <19920907.154445.51@almaden.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 92 18:45:10 EDT
Subject: Re: C++ Compiler for OS/2, which is NOT GNIU
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
References: <4MS6CQW@netmbx.netmbx.de> <5wqn93g.xtifr@netcom.com> <_yqnl!m.feustel@netcom.com>
Organization: C-Set/2 Development, IBM Canada Lab.
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
Lines: 19

Reply to Parent Message