Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #933Re: Missing documentation - KBD, MOU and VIO
From: David Feustel
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 00:54
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 00:54
45 lines
2641 bytes
2641 bytes
terryfry@access.digex.com (Terry Fry) writes: >In article <715981801snx@sugs.tware.com> landis@sugs.tware.com (Hale Landis) writes: >>In article <9209080106.AA19548@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> KENKAHN@PKSMRVM.VNET.IBM.COM writes: >> >> > In <715895337snx@sugs.tware.com> Hale Landis writes: >> > >Has anyone found the (missing) documentation for the KBD, MOU and >> > >VIO functions in the OS/2 2.0 manuals? >>Sorry, but I think that is the wrong answer: I don't have the >>1.x technical manuals and I bet few other people have them! If >>these are supported, even if for backward compatibility, I should >>be able to find some reference to them in the 2.0 manuals. Also, >>if they are considered 'old', then what replaces them? How about >>some documentation to aid us old (read non-GUI) programmers that >>have programs that use these functions? >I havn't found any reference to the 1.x calls in the 2.0 toolkit, either. >I happen to have the MS PM 1.2 Toolkit, I just loaded up the quickhelp >and run with this. >> >>My bet is that there are far more non-GUI (not PM) programs >>than there are GUI (PM) programs for OS/2. I also would bet >>that a lot of these will get 'upgraded' to 2.0 without being >>converted to PM programs. By not including any documentation >>(not even the slightest reference) that I can find in the 2.0 >>manuals, IBM is not making life easy out here. >Your right, I think that IBM has under-estimated the amount of programers >that simply want to code in a Vio format. Most of what everyone >here does is get whatever engine they want running in a full screen >program... then its PM time. This habit came from inherit problems >debugging under 1.x PM with codeview and dealing with Async events. >I don't think that 2.0 needs a 32bit Vio system, just some reference >for us to utilize the 16 system there. Anyone who has an old copy of the Microsoft Programmer's CDROM already has the documentation for the old calls. -- Dave Feustel N9MYI <feustel@netcom.com> RE Drug Warriors who enjoy making a "good" bust: I'm sure the Salem Witch Hunters enjoyed their law enforcement achievements too.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<m8sn-9l.feustel@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!feustelReferences:
<9209080106.AA19548@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <715981801snx@sugs.tware.com> <1992Sep9.065413.9051@access.digex.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!feustel From: feustel@netcom.com (David Feustel) Subject: Re: Missing documentation - KBD, MOU and VIO Message-ID: <m8sn-9l.feustel@netcom.com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 00:54:16 GMT Organization: DAFCO: OS/2 Software Support & Consulting References: <9209080106.AA19548@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <715981801snx@sugs.tware.com> <1992Sep9.065413.9051@access.digex.com> Lines: 45