Re: OS/2 vs NT somewhere else

Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer

Article #979

Back to comp.os.os2.programmer Previous Next

#979

From: Pete Bergstrom
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 20:06

25 lines
1628 bytes

shurr@cbnews.cb.att.com (larry.a.shurr) writes:
>In article <1992Sep10.194147.1@vax1.umkc.edu> browland@vax1.umkc.edu writes:
>>Please make arrangements to place your observations
>>of a released OS (I use it at work for work) vs a
>>smoke and mirror FUD product at a site that those
>>of us (not I) who wish to spend more bandwith than
>>alt...binaries does can get it.
>
>Contrariwise.  Please continue to post the OS/2 - NT comparison 
>document in this forum.  It has a higher information content than
>many of the things posted here or anywhere else in the news
>hierarchy and I find it of interest.

I *might* be able to tolerate posting the document itself here - but
absolutely keep the discussion in .advocacy, where it belongs.

In fact, when someone follows up to that discussion in .programmer, I
hope everyone will email that person and indicate that it is
inappropriate. 

As far as information content, I find .programmer is the highest
quality forum among the comp.os.os2.* newsgroups.  

Pete

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9209112006.AA04902@data.src.honeywell.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!src.honeywell.com!mail-enters-news

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!src.honeywell.com!mail-enters-news
From: bergstro@src.honeywell.com (Pete Bergstrom)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: OS/2 vs NT somewhere else
Message-ID: <9209112006.AA04902@data.src.honeywell.com>
Date: 11 Sep 92 20:06:44 GMT
Sender: daemon@src.honeywell.com
Organization: Honeywell Systems & Research Center
Lines: 25
In-Reply-To: shurr@cbnews.cb.att.com's message of Fri, 11 Sep 1992 18: 49:05 GM
To: comp.os.os2.programmer
Posted-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 92 15: 06:44 CDT
Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 92 15: 06:50 CDT