Article View: comp.os.os2.setup.misc
Article #167Re: 60ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp?
From: Scott R. Eliason
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 00:00
40 lines
2787 bytes
2787 bytes
On 20 Apr 1996 John@.MISSING-HOST-NAME. wrote:
[snip snip snip]
> Now hear this. OS/2, W95, and even the mighty UNIX, have absolutely no
> idea what the speed of the memory is. They don't care, it matters not at all,
> and anyone who says that the OS knows, or cares, is wrong. Plain and
> simple!
>
[snip]
Hmmmm..., I may be getting into this thread a bit late, but
if this issue is so "plain and simple" then why do some
authorities disagree with you in print? For example, the authors of
_OS/2 Warp Unleashed_ state, "A Trap 0002 almost always indicates a
problem exists with the physical memory. The most common causes are
single inline memory modules (SIMMs) that are not the same speed..." (P.
943) Unless I'm missing something here, your statement is entirely at
odds with this statement as well as others. Another example can be found
in the _User's Guide to OS/2 Warp_, which comes with Warp itself and is
published by IBM. Here, on p. 175 the author's explain that a Trap 0002
error can be due to mismatched SIMMs that operated at different speeds.
You go on to say:
> have we got it now? Mix the speeds. faster won't hurt! No OS on the planet
> can determine ram access speed! No OS cares!
>
Well, it seems that at least from two sources, you are overstating the
case. The OS may not "care" (whatever that means), but according to
these sources it may get tripped up in accessing memory from SIMMs of
different speeds.
===========================================================================
Scott R. Eliason Email: scott-eliason@uiowa.edu
Department of Sociology
University of Iowa
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Pine.A32.3.91.960420165803.51803A@black.weeg.uiowa.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4khecg$3g8e@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <4kk4tf$ksq@news.aros.net> <4kq5f0$ehl@usenet6.interramp.com> <4l82km$4ah@cabell.vcu.edu> <4l9eei$gil@news.aros.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ee4f,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ee4f,public X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public X-Google-Thread: f4337,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4337,public X-Google-Thread: 10c4f5,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gid10c4f5,public From: "Scott R. Eliason" <seliason@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu> Subject: Re: 60ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp? Date: 1996/04/20 Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.91.960420165803.51803A@black.weeg.uiowa.edu> X-Deja-AN: 150556619 distribution: world references: <4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4khecg$3g8e@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <4kk4tf$ksq@news.aros.net> <4kq5f0$ehl@usenet6.interramp.com> <4l82km$4ah@cabell.vcu.edu> <4l9eei$gil@news.aros.net> x-sender: seliason@black.weeg.uiowa.edu content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII organization: University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.os.os2.setup.misc,comp.os.os2.bugs,bit.listserv.os2-l,alt.org.team-os2