Article View: comp.os.os2.setup.misc
Article #17960ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp?
From: Erik Huelsmann
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 00:00
50 lines
3022 bytes
3022 bytes
Hello edwin! Replying to a message of edwin bailen to All: >>> Some basic things to check for when a customer is experiencing trap >>> errors of any kind include: >> >>> 1. All memory SIMMs must be the same size and speed... >>> 2. All SIMMs should be from the same manufacturer. >>> 3. If the customer has mixed memory SIMMs, it may be possible to get >>> them to work, although this would be a configuration unsupported by >>> OS/2 >> >> Unbelievable! >> >>> If mixed memory SIMMs are being used, the customer must place the >>> SLOWER speed memory in the first or lowest address sockets. This >>> approach occasionally works because OS/2 tests memory in the lower >>> address space to determine its speed, then runs ALL memory at that >>> speed >> >> This is utter garbage! >> >> Who wrote this book? >> >>> ... because OS/2 tests memory in the lower address space to determine >>> its speed, then runs ALL memory at that speed >> >> Unbelieveable! OS/2 *cannot* "determine the speed of a bank of memory". >> Period. -Kenny -- Kenneth R. Crudup, Unix & OS/2 Software >> Consultant, Scott County Consulting kenny@panix.com CI$: 75032,3044 eb> When I was running 2.1, I added some memory, and the system would not eb> boot. When I called the OS/2 tech support line, their statement was eb> "Oh, all of the memory in the system must be of the same type and eb> speed, and from the same vendor." Right or wrong, they are at least eb> consistent. Well, that is correct, but that is because of timing problems, not with OS/2, but with the mobo and the memory chips. These were problems of the earlier mobo's (and some later mobos) but this problem is assumed to be over on 72-pin simms. Obviously the 32-pin simms were not exactly enough specificated to handle the timing problems. As chips with same size/speed/manufacturer are to be considered compatible, this is what was advised at the time. Bye, Erik! -- | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<e2a_9604181954@idn.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4kk4tf$ksq@news.aros.net> <4kq5f0$ehl@usenet6.interramp.com> <4kuqs2$g76@usenet2.interramp.com> <4l144f$75r@panix2.panix.com> <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960417123353.8471C-100000@matrix.eden.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public X-Google-Thread: 10ee4f,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ee4f,public X-Google-Thread: f4337,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4337,public X-Google-Thread: 10c4f5,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gid10c4f5,public From: ErikH@hcc-gron.idn.nl (Erik Huelsmann) Subject: 60ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp? Date: 1996/04/18 Message-ID: <e2a_9604181954@idn.nl> X-Deja-AN: 148264015 references: <4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4kk4tf$ksq@news.aros.net> <4kq5f0$ehl@usenet6.interramp.com> <4kuqs2$g76@usenet2.interramp.com> <4l144f$75r@panix2.panix.com> <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960417123353.8471C-100000@matrix.eden.com> organization: IDN Internet Gateway newsgroups: comp.os.os2.setup.misc,comp.os.os2.bugs,bit.listserv.os2-l,alt.org.team-os2 x-ftn-to: edwin bailen