🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.setup.misc
Article #179

60ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp?

#179
From: Erik Huelsmann
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 00:00
50 lines
3022 bytes
Hello edwin!

Replying to a message of edwin bailen  to All:

 >>> Some basic things to check for when a customer is experiencing trap
 >>> errors of  any kind include:
 >> 
 >>> 1. All memory SIMMs must be the same size and speed...
 >>> 2. All SIMMs should be from the same manufacturer.
 >>> 3. If the customer has mixed memory SIMMs, it may be possible to get
 >>> them to  work, although this would be a configuration unsupported by
 >>> OS/2
 >> 
 >> Unbelievable!
 >> 
 >>> If mixed memory SIMMs are being used, the customer must place the
 >>> SLOWER  speed memory in the first or lowest address sockets.  This
 >>> approach  occasionally works because OS/2 tests memory in the lower
 >>> address space to  determine its speed, then runs ALL memory at that
 >>> speed
 >> 
 >> This is utter garbage!
 >> 
 >> Who wrote this book?
 >> 
 >>> ... because OS/2 tests memory in the lower address space to determine
 >>> its speed, then runs ALL memory at that speed
 >> 
 >> Unbelieveable! OS/2 *cannot* "determine the speed of a bank of memory".
 >> Period.   -Kenny  --  Kenneth R. Crudup, Unix & OS/2 Software
 >> Consultant, Scott County Consulting kenny@panix.com  CI$: 75032,3044  

 eb> When I was running 2.1, I added some memory, and the system would not 
 eb> boot.  When I called the OS/2 tech support line, their statement was
 eb> "Oh,  all of the memory in the system must be of the same type and
 eb> speed, and  from the same vendor."  Right or wrong, they are at least
 eb> consistent.
Well, that is correct, but that is because of timing problems, not with OS/2,
but with the mobo and the memory chips. These were problems of the earlier
mobo's (and some later mobos) but this problem is assumed to be over on 72-pin
simms. Obviously the 32-pin simms were not exactly enough specificated to
handle the timing problems.

As chips with same size/speed/manufacturer are to be considered compatible,
this is what was advised at the time.


Bye, Erik!
--
| Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <e2a_9604181954@idn.nl>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4kk4tf$ksq@news.aros.net> <4kq5f0$ehl@usenet6.interramp.com> <4kuqs2$g76@usenet2.interramp.com> <4l144f$75r@panix2.panix.com> <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960417123353.8471C-100000@matrix.eden.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,d82d6820978e5010
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public
X-Google-Thread: 10ee4f,d82d6820978e5010
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ee4f,public
X-Google-Thread: f4337,d82d6820978e5010
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4337,public
X-Google-Thread: 10c4f5,d82d6820978e5010
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c4f5,public
From: ErikH@hcc-gron.idn.nl (Erik Huelsmann)
Subject: 60ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp?
Date: 1996/04/18
Message-ID: <e2a_9604181954@idn.nl>
X-Deja-AN: 148264015
references: <4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4kk4tf$ksq@news.aros.net> <4kq5f0$ehl@usenet6.interramp.com> <4kuqs2$g76@usenet2.interramp.com> <4l144f$75r@panix2.panix.com> <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960417123353.8471C-100000@matrix.eden.com>
organization: IDN Internet Gateway
newsgroups: comp.os.os2.setup.misc,comp.os.os2.bugs,bit.listserv.os2-l,alt.org.team-os2
x-ftn-to: edwin bailen