Article View: comp.os.os2.setup.misc
Article #184Re: 60ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp?
From: edwin bailen
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 00:00
50 lines
2797 bytes
2797 bytes
On 16 Apr 1996, Kenneth Crudup wrote: > In article <4kuqs2$g76@usenet2.interramp.com>, > ir003870@interramp.com (Billy Ko) says: > > >Excerpt from Inside OS/2 Warp, page 804: > > >Some basic things to check for when a customer is experiencing trap errors of > >any kind include: > > >1. All memory SIMMs must be the same size and speed... > >2. All SIMMs should be from the same manufacturer. > >3. If the customer has mixed memory SIMMs, it may be possible to get them to > >work, although this would be a configuration unsupported by OS/2 > > Unbelievable! > > >If mixed memory SIMMs are being used, the customer must place the SLOWER > >speed memory in the first or lowest address sockets. This approach > >occasionally works because OS/2 tests memory in the lower address space to > >determine its speed, then runs ALL memory at that speed > > This is utter garbage! > > Who wrote this book? > > >... because OS/2 tests memory in the lower address space to determine its > >speed, then runs ALL memory at that speed > > Unbelieveable! OS/2 *cannot* "determine the speed of a bank of memory". > Period. > > -Kenny > > -- > Kenneth R. Crudup, Unix & OS/2 Software Consultant, Scott County Consulting > kenny@panix.com CI$: 75032,3044 +1 617 524 5929/4949 Home/Office > 16 Plainfield St, Boston, MA 02130-3633 +1 617 983 9410 Fax > OS/2 box: pkenny.tiac.net (when I'm online) Get Warp-ed! OS/2 3.0 is here NOW! When I was running 2.1, I added some memory, and the system would not boot. When I called the OS/2 tech support line, their statement was "Oh, all of the memory in the system must be of the same type and speed, and from the same vendor." Right or wrong, they are at least consistent. P.S. I haven't had an opportunity to check my Bios yet. Regards, Ed
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Pine.BSD/.3.91.960417123353.8471C-100000@matrix.eden.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4kk4tf$ksq@news.aros.net> <4kq5f0$ehl@usenet6.interramp.com> <4kuqs2$g76@usenet2.interramp.com> <4l144f$75r@panix2.panix.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f4337,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4337,public X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public X-Google-Thread: 10c4f5,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gid10c4f5,public X-Google-Thread: 10ee4f,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ee4f,public From: edwin bailen <n5kzw@eden.com> Subject: Re: 60ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp? Date: 1996/04/17 Message-ID: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960417123353.8471C-100000@matrix.eden.com> X-Deja-AN: 148025336 references: <4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4kk4tf$ksq@news.aros.net> <4kq5f0$ehl@usenet6.interramp.com> <4kuqs2$g76@usenet2.interramp.com> <4l144f$75r@panix2.panix.com> content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII organization: Adhesive Media, Inc. mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.os.os2.setup.misc,comp.os.os2.bugs,bit.listserv.os2-l,alt.org.team-os2