🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.setup.misc
Article #188

Re: 60ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp?

#188
From: Kenneth Crudup
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 00:00
39 lines
2633 bytes
In article <4ktfu9$1mu4@mule2.mindspring.com>,
fdrennon@pobox.com (Floyd Drennon) says:

>And this is the exact point I was making.  You were raving about setting the
>speed and no such option exists.

There is no simple "speed" option for the people who have no business in there
in the first place. Memory timing is done by a series of operations, several
of which can be set.

>You say it can't sense the speed and then you turn right around and say to
>use the default.  If you can use the default then you don't need to change
>the setting in the first place.

>Your whole tirade makes absolutely no sense, you've totally contradicted
>what you said first.

*sigh*

The key word is "If you don't know what you're doing". Memory timing is not
for people who can't understand simple electronics.

Some people, like yourself, evidently, don't mind driving a family station
wagon. Others like to soup up their engines. I don't leave *any* of my MBs
on the "default"- that's the *slowest*, "most safe" speed and guaranteed
to leave your machine running at far less than it's potential because it
uses the most pessimistic settings for memory timing. There is no "contra-
diction, because the machine is still only assuming the memory inserted
is at least fast enought to keep up with it's slowest speed (100 ns?). I put
that in there to avoid tripping up the adventurous, so those who don't
know WTF they're doing won't come to me looking for help.

	-Kenny

-- 
Kenneth R. Crudup, Unix & OS/2 Software Consultant, Scott County Consulting
kenny@panix.com		CI$: 75032,3044	  +1 617 524 5929/4949 Home/Office
16 Plainfield St, Boston, MA 02130-3633	  +1 617 983 9410      Fax
OS/2 box: pkenny.tiac.net (when I'm online) Get Warp-ed! OS/2 3.0 is here NOW!
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4ktthb$4o5@panix2.panix.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4ksenf$1sl0@mule2.mindspring.com> <4ksq7v$kob@panix2.panix.com> <4ktfu9$1mu4@mule2.mindspring.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,d82d6820978e5010
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public
X-Google-Thread: 10ee4f,d82d6820978e5010
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ee4f,public
X-Google-Thread: 10c4f5,d82d6820978e5010
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c4f5,public
X-Google-Thread: f4337,d82d6820978e5010
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4337,public
From: kenny@panix.com (Kenneth Crudup)
Subject: Re: 60ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp?
Date: 1996/04/15
Message-ID: <4ktthb$4o5@panix2.panix.com>
X-Deja-AN: 147614919
references: <4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4ksenf$1sl0@mule2.mindspring.com> <4ksq7v$kob@panix2.panix.com> <4ktfu9$1mu4@mule2.mindspring.com>
organization: Scott County Consulting, Boston, MA
newsgroups: comp.os.os2.setup.misc,comp.os.os2.bugs,bit.listserv.os2-l,alt.org.team-os2