Article View: comp.os.os2.setup.misc
Article #188Re: 60ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp?
From: Kenneth Crudup
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 00:00
39 lines
2633 bytes
2633 bytes
In article <4ktfu9$1mu4@mule2.mindspring.com>, fdrennon@pobox.com (Floyd Drennon) says: >And this is the exact point I was making. You were raving about setting the >speed and no such option exists. There is no simple "speed" option for the people who have no business in there in the first place. Memory timing is done by a series of operations, several of which can be set. >You say it can't sense the speed and then you turn right around and say to >use the default. If you can use the default then you don't need to change >the setting in the first place. >Your whole tirade makes absolutely no sense, you've totally contradicted >what you said first. *sigh* The key word is "If you don't know what you're doing". Memory timing is not for people who can't understand simple electronics. Some people, like yourself, evidently, don't mind driving a family station wagon. Others like to soup up their engines. I don't leave *any* of my MBs on the "default"- that's the *slowest*, "most safe" speed and guaranteed to leave your machine running at far less than it's potential because it uses the most pessimistic settings for memory timing. There is no "contra- diction, because the machine is still only assuming the memory inserted is at least fast enought to keep up with it's slowest speed (100 ns?). I put that in there to avoid tripping up the adventurous, so those who don't know WTF they're doing won't come to me looking for help. -Kenny -- Kenneth R. Crudup, Unix & OS/2 Software Consultant, Scott County Consulting kenny@panix.com CI$: 75032,3044 +1 617 524 5929/4949 Home/Office 16 Plainfield St, Boston, MA 02130-3633 +1 617 983 9410 Fax OS/2 box: pkenny.tiac.net (when I'm online) Get Warp-ed! OS/2 3.0 is here NOW!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4ktthb$4o5@panix2.panix.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4ksenf$1sl0@mule2.mindspring.com> <4ksq7v$kob@panix2.panix.com> <4ktfu9$1mu4@mule2.mindspring.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public X-Google-Thread: 10ee4f,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ee4f,public X-Google-Thread: 10c4f5,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gid10c4f5,public X-Google-Thread: f4337,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4337,public From: kenny@panix.com (Kenneth Crudup) Subject: Re: 60ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp? Date: 1996/04/15 Message-ID: <4ktthb$4o5@panix2.panix.com> X-Deja-AN: 147614919 references: <4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4ksenf$1sl0@mule2.mindspring.com> <4ksq7v$kob@panix2.panix.com> <4ktfu9$1mu4@mule2.mindspring.com> organization: Scott County Consulting, Boston, MA newsgroups: comp.os.os2.setup.misc,comp.os.os2.bugs,bit.listserv.os2-l,alt.org.team-os2