🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.setup.misc
Article #191

Re: 60ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp?

#191
From: Billy Ko
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 00:00
66 lines
3221 bytes
In message <4krr9c$nbv@panix2.panix.com> - kenny@panix.com (Kenneth Crudup) wri
tes:
:>
:>In article <4kq5f0$ehl@usenet6.interramp.com>,
:>ir003870@interramp.com (Billy Ko) says:
:>
:>>The recommended thing to do is put the SLOWEST memory in the first bank!  The 
:>>reason is this: the fast chip can always slow down to the speed of the slow 
:>>chip, but the slow chip can't keep up with the fast one.
:>
:>*sigh*
:>
:>Where do people *get* this bullsh*t?
:>
:>>BTW - when marching, the military always puts the smallest guys in front, so 
:>>that the big guys won't run away from the small ones.  Same reasoning.  Slow 
:>>in front, fast in back, and for much the same reason.
:>
:>So?
:>
:>>I got this info from page 804, Inside OS/2 Warp
:>
:>I don't believe it.
:>
:>I've worked with MBs where the *largest* bank of memory had to be bank 0, (due
:>to refresh issues) but that has nothing to do with speed. I've mixed speeds
:>between banks all the time.
:>
:>A MOTHERBOARD CANNOT GUESS THE SPEED OF A BANK OF MEMORY! It will *not*
:>know until you program it to CMOS. Set the speed in non-EDO systems to that
:>of the slowest memory *in any bank*, and it will all behave fine!
:>
:>	-Kenny
:>
:>-- 
:>Kenneth R. Crudup, Unix & OS/2 Software Consultant, Scott County Consulting
:>kenny@panix.com		CI$: 75032,3044	  +1 617 524 5929/4949 Home/Office
:>16 Plainfield St, Boston, MA 02130-3633	  +1 617 983 9410      Fax
:>OS/2 box: pkenny.tiac.net (when I'm online) Get Warp-ed! OS/2 3.0 is here NOW!

Excerpt from Inside OS/2 Warp, page 804:

Trap Errors and Memory Problems
Some basic things to check for when a customer is experiencing trap errors of 
any kind include:

1. All memory SIMMs must be the same size and speed...

2. All SIMMs should be from the same manufacturer.

3. If the customer has mixed memory SIMMs, it may be possible to get them to 
work, although this would be a configuration unsupported by OS/2

If mixed memory SIMMs are being used, the customer must place the SLOWER 
speed memory in the first or lowest address sockets.  This approach 
occasionally works because OS/2 tests memory in the lower address space to 
determine its speed, then runs ALL memory at that speed


And one more tip:

Please don't engage in personal type attacks, it is very unbecoming of a 
person.

Bill
Team OS/2
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4kuqs2$g76@usenet2.interramp.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4khecg$3g8e@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <4kk4tf$ksq@news.aros.net> <4kq5f0$ehl@usenet6.interramp.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10ee4f,d82d6820978e5010
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ee4f,public
X-Google-Thread: f4337,d82d6820978e5010
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4337,public
X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,d82d6820978e5010
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public
X-Google-Thread: 10c4f5,d82d6820978e5010
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c4f5,public
From: ir003870@interramp.com (Billy Ko)
Subject: Re: 60ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp?
Date: 1996/04/16
Message-ID: <4kuqs2$g76@usenet2.interramp.com>
X-Deja-AN: 147700330
references: <4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4khecg$3g8e@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <4kk4tf$ksq@news.aros.net> <4kq5f0$ehl@usenet6.interramp.com>
organization: PSI Public Usenet Link
newsgroups: comp.os.os2.setup.misc,comp.os.os2.bugs,bit.listserv.os2-l,alt.org.team-os2