🚀 go-pugleaf

In message <4kmvo1$ol3@news.pathcom.com> - stonet@pathcom.com (stonet) writes:

:>
:>In message <4kgg09$71n@news.wco.com> - tiijahar@dsp.com  (Harri Kaukovuo) write
:>s:
:>->>I'm planning to upgrade my computer's memory. Right now I have 16MB (70ns)
:>->>installed. I wanted to put 16 or 32 more MB. I've got a good deal for 60ns
:>->>SIMMS, but I would like to know if there are problems if you put 60ns SIMMS
:>->>together with 70ns SIMMS. Any advice?
:>->>
:>->Just change your CMOS settings to reflect 70ns memory and you should be fine.
:>->Warp should not care what is the speed of your memory, but CMOS settings
:>->should reflect the slowest speed you are using.
:>->-- Harri
:>->---------------------------------------------------------------------
:>->Harri Kaukovuo                          "Nuoruuden voi tuhlata muttei saastaa"
:>->142 Elm Street #204                             -Pelle Miljoona
:>->San Mateo, Ca 94401,USA             Email: tiijahar@dsp.com
:>
:>Isn't 70 ns a velocity measurement, therefore the larger the number the 
:>faster the access....
:>
:>Damn....where's the off button..... :>
:>
:>===============================================================
:>stonet@pathcom.com				Toronto, Canada
:>

If I didn't have a sense of humor, I'd say that the speed of the chip (70ns, 
or whatever) refers to the time it takes for the memory to go from a 0 to a 1 
and back again.  Commonly refered to as the ramp time.  Ideally, a chip 
should have a ramp time of 0ns, but that's impossible to achieve.

We would like to see a ramp that looks like this on an O'scope:

   __
__|  |__

but they always look more like:

   __
__/  \__

Bill
Team OS/2

And up too late...  ;)