Rubbish in Usenet messages

Article View: comp.os.os2

Article #1067

#1067

From: Kenneth Neal
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1990 03:48

15 lines
938 bytes

 
  I think that the extra lines are a bit much.  Maybe you could trim them 
down to the Date and Ogranization lines.  It nice to know where they are 
from.  And the date helps keep the message flow staight.
 
  BTW, do our messages go to Usenet?  I am responding to someone in a 
following message.


--  
Kenneth Neal - via FidoNet node 1:140/22
UUCP: alberta!dvinci!weyr!110!69.0!Kenneth.Neal
Internet: Kenneth.Neal@p0.f69.n110.z1.FIDONET.ORG
Standard Disclaimers Apply...

Technical Details

Message-ID: <315.25C829F1@weyr.FIDONET.ORG>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!alberta!dvinci!weyr!p0.f69.n110.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Kenneth.Neal

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!alberta!dvinci!weyr!p0.f69.n110.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Kenneth.Neal
From: Kenneth.Neal@p0.f69.n110.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Kenneth Neal)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2
Subject: Rubbish in Usenet messages
Message-ID: <315.25C829F1@weyr.FIDONET.ORG>
Date: 30 Jan 90 03:48:12 GMT
Sender: ufgate@weyr.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:110/69.0 - D.M.U.G BBS, Dayton OH
Lines: 15